Alan, thanks a stack for sharing.
Rob
From: Alan Grimes
Sent: Sunday, 17 June 2018 7:34 PM
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Lossy Compressed Blockchain As Temporal Memory (still
non-mutable)
Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI wrote:
> For now, I'd l
Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI wrote:
> For now, I'd like to continue developing a feasible, logical, AGI
> architecture. One day then, the corresponding, physical architecture
> specification.
>
> Rob
Ok, lemme throw this on the table, in case anyone missed it:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 6:32 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> > I think that all money spent on marketing at this point is not only a
> waste,
> > but it is actually worse than doing no marketing, because people hear of
> the
> > project before it's released, then they get a poor first impression and
We're gonna post our revised SingularityNET roadmap in the next couple
weeks, and indeed it reflects a path in which our initial platform
launch doesn't depend on third-party technologies now at the
experimental stage...
However, we are also getting started in actively collaborating w/
other
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Mark Nuzz wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
>
>> > My opinion on those technologies you mention is that, while novel and
>> > promising, they are still in an experimental stage. It's a huge mistake
>> to
>> > assemble a system
> My opinion on those technologies you mention is that, while novel and
> promising, they are still in an experimental stage. It's a huge mistake to
> assemble a system composed of multiple experimental or bleeding edge
> technologies
No it isn't.
Most who try this will fail...
But some subset
hare with me where I could access these AGI proposals you mentioned?
Rob
From: Mark Nuzz via AGI
Sent: Sunday, 17 June 2018 7:38 AM
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Lossy Compressed Blockchain As Temporal Memory (still
non-mutable)
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 9:54 PM,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI <
agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote:
> Stepping back for a moment to be able to see better what is being said.
> It's a jumble out there.
>
> Any computational solution would require a technology stack for every
> purpose to be
-and future technology stack(s) and plug them into a
logical, FUTURE-PROOFED, AGI solutions architecture?
Rob
-
From: bengoert...@gmail.com on behalf of Ben Goertzel
Sent: Sunday, 17 June 2018 5:12 AM
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Lossy Compressed Blockchain
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Matt Mahoney via AGI
> wrote:
> > No, Stefan Reich and Mark Nuzz are right. Blockchain has nothing to do
> > with AGI and doesn't help.
> >
> > Blockchain is a terrible way to implement a distributed data
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Matt Mahoney via AGI
wrote:
> No, Stefan Reich and Mark Nuzz are right. Blockchain has nothing to do
> with AGI and doesn't help.
>
> Blockchain is a terrible way to implement a distributed data store. It
> is not scalable. Every node stores a copy of every
Please, no blockchain in AI... it really doesn't help anything.
Cheers,
Stefan
On 16 June 2018 at 14:45, wrote:
> Distributed decentralized autonomous AGI, temporal memory, lossy =
> forgetting even just dropping blocks, some memory on-chain some off.
> On-chain slower more secure, off-chain
12 matches
Mail list logo
