Re: [agi] I Still Do Not Believe That Probability Is a Good Basis for AGI

2017-04-10 Thread Nanograte Knowledge Technologies
Agreed on all counts. No deabstraction logic could become programmable without it, at least, being specified in pseudo code. My experience with this problem taught that it would require a large, dedicated team of extremely-smart programmers to be able to write the code. Further, they would have

Re: [agi] I Still Do Not Believe That Probability Is a Good Basis for AGI

2017-04-10 Thread Jim Bromer
I think that computational models can be fully integrated into probability nets but I think that there are some important computational functions (algorithms that need to run efficiently) that are missing. As I tried to understand what you were asking I realized that I could reanalyze my thoughts