Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda

2007-03-18 Thread Charles D Hixson
Russell Wallace wrote: On 3/13/07, *J. Storrs Hall, PhD.* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But the bottom line problem for using FOPC (or whatever) to represent the world is not that it's computationally incapable of it -- it's Turing complete, after all -- but

Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda

2007-03-18 Thread Russell Wallace
On 3/18/07, Charles D Hixson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps it would be best to have, say, four different formats for different classes of problems (with the understanding that most problems are mixed). E.g., some classes of problems are best represented via a priority queue, others via a

Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda

2007-03-18 Thread Charles D Hixson
Russell Wallace wrote: On 3/18/07, *Charles D Hixson* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps it would be best to have, say, four different formats for different classes of problems (with the understanding that most problems are mixed). E.g., some classes of

Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda

2007-03-18 Thread Russell Wallace
On 3/19/07, Charles D Hixson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, datawise a priority queue is just a set of things with priority numbers attached and the alpha-beta algorithm is, well, an algorithm, but neither of those is propositional logic. Yes, you CAN represent them as logic (you can represent