Jeez there's always something new. Anyone know about this (which seems at a
glance loosely relevant to Ben's approach) ?
http://www.emergent-languages.org/
Overview
This site provides an introduction to the research on emergent and
evolutionary languages as conducted at the Sony Computer
I havn't read any of Luc Steels stuff for a long time, but he has been
researching the evolution of language using robots or software agents
since the early 1990s. This is really a symbol grounding problem
where the communication in some way needs to represent things or
situations which the agent
I have been collaborating with this lab on their Fluid Construction Grammar
system, as described briefly in this blog post:
http://texai.org/blog/2007/10/24/fluid-construction-grammar
I downloaded their Common Lisp implementation and rewrote it in Java and
demonstrated that I could achieve the
I got a free hour this afternoon, and posted a little more technical information
about our plans for OpenCog, here:
http://opencog.org/wiki/OpenCog_Technical_Information
Nothing surprising or dramatic, mostly just a clear online explanation of our
basic plans, as have already been discussed in
On 1/30/08, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kaj,
[This is just a preliminary answer: I am composing a full essay now,
which will appear in my blog. This is such a complex debate that it
needs to be unpacked in a lot more detail than is possible here. Richard].
Richard,
I doubt that 3D object recognition is integral to 'genuine
intelligence'. Theoretically, if we had an AGI we should be able to
put it in a simulated 2D world and it would still act intelligently.
IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
integral to mathematics. If you
IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
integral to mathematics.
The counterargument is that no one has yet made an AI virtual chimp ...
and nearly all of the human brain is the same as that of a chimp ...
I think that language-centric approaches are viable, but I
On Feb 4, 2008 11:27 AM, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
integral to mathematics.
The counterargument is that no one has yet made an AI virtual chimp ...
and nearly all of the human brain is the same as that of a
Hi,
I'd be interested in what you see as the path from SLAM to AGI.
To me, language generation seems obvious: 1. Make a language and
algorithms for generating stuff in that language. 2. Implement pattern
recognition and abstraction (imo not _that_ hard if you've designed
your language well)
On Feb 4, 2008 12:12 PM, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The robotics path to AI is a lot like the evolutionary path to natural
intelligence...
Create a system that learns to achieve simple sensorimotor goals in
its environment...
then move on to social goals... and language eventually
10 matches
Mail list logo
