Joseph H:
Mike, what is your stance on vector images?
--
Hi Joe,
What's the point of this question? Is it something like: geometry can be used
to analyse any shapes?
Matt Mahoney wrote:
Remember that the goal is to test for understanding in intelligent
agents that are not necessarily human. What does it mean for a machine to
understand something? What does it mean to understand a string of bits?
Have you considered testing intelligent agents by simply
--- Stan Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
Remember that the goal is to test for understanding in intelligent
agents that are not necessarily human. What does it mean for a
machine to
understand something? What does it mean to understand a string of
bits?
Matt Mahoney wrote:
--- Stan Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
Remember that the goal is to test for understanding in intelligent
agents that are not necessarily human. What does it mean for a
machine to
understand something? What does it mean to understand a string of
Well, I figured the point of the question would be pretty clear seeing as
you were claiming a logical/mathematical description of images would be
inadequate, but I don't think that could be further from the truth...
You could recreate a large amount of detail in an image using mathematics
and it
--- Stan Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
--- Stan Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
Remember that the goal is to test for understanding in intelligent
agents that are not necessarily human. What does it mean for a
machine to
understand
Mike, here's your bucket.
Circle(0,50,10)
Circle(0,45,10)
Ring(0,45,6,8)
Cylinder(0,50,45,10)
Cylinder(0,45,-10,8)
Disk(0,-10,8)
- Joe
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed:
Joe,
Thanks for reply - yes, I thought you meant something like this, but it's good
to have it spelled out.
I think you're making what seems to me to be a v. common mistake among AGI-ers.
Yes, you can reduce any image whatsoever on a computer screen, to some set of
mathemetical
Joe,
And here's a perhaps easier [?], certainly more commonplace set - how will
your system recognize each is Madonna:
http://www.the-planets.com/madonna/madonna_200.jpg
http://www.ouvre.com/wp-content/banniere-itms-madonna.png
Mike,
On 5/12/08, Mike Tintner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading the following in a psych. group, made me think of your diagnostic
program - the real world is generally messy: The principle applies to all
AGI programs.
there is of course an interesting phenomenon in medicine generally
- Original Message
Stan Nilsen wrote:
After thinking a bit more, I see that there are other ways to
understand that do not deal with process. I can think of two cases
of a different kind of understanding (and there are others I'm sure)
Case 1 example: Do you understand wood?
11 matches
Mail list logo
