Re: [agi] This is not a good turn for the discussion [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes ...]

2008-02-18 Thread Harshad RJ
On Feb 18, 2008 10:11 PM, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You assume that the system does not go through a learning phase > (childhood) during which it acquires its knowledge by itself. Why do > you assume this? Because an AGI that was motivated only to seek > electricity and phe

Re: [agi] This is not a good turn for the discussion [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes ...]

2008-02-18 Thread Harshad RJ
On Feb 3, 2008 10:22 PM, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Harshad RJ wrote: > > I read the conversation from the start and believe that Matt's > > argument is correct. > > Did you mean to send this only to me? It looks as though you mean it > fo

Re: [agi] A 1st Step To Using Your Image-ination

2008-02-18 Thread Harshad RJ
On Feb 17, 2008 3:16 AM, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And where, say, does any computer system do as a cartoonist does - observe > direct, essentially photographic images of people, and then sketch those > faces/forms - and exaggerate/diminish features - selectively, > non-formulaical