Re: **SPAM** Re: [agi] Development Environments for AI (a few non-religious comments!)

2007-02-21 Thread Mike Dougherty
On 2/21/07, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The language thread has been reasonably abstruse already, but proposing doing AI by stored procedures in relational databases backed by ~10 ms access time devices... Hey, why not tapes? I think you could implement a reasonably competent Turing

Re: **SPAM** Re: [agi] Development Environments for AI (a few non-religious comments!)

2007-02-20 Thread Mark Waser
on it there. - Original Message - From: Russell Wallace To: agi@v2.listbox.com Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 3:31 PM Subject: **SPAM** Re: [agi] Development Environments for AI (a few non-religious comments!) On 2/20/07, Mark Waser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Realistically, you'll have

Re: **SPAM** Re: [agi] Development Environments for AI (a few non-religious comments!)

2007-02-20 Thread Russell Wallace
On 2/20/07, Mark Waser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that you grossly underestimate the magnitude of what is being proposed because the tag development environment has been attached to it.:-) *grin* No, I think it's a big project, at least the version I have in mind (on my to-do list

Re: **SPAM** Re: [agi] Development Environments for AI (a few non-religious comments!)

2007-02-20 Thread Ben Goertzel
Also, why would 32 - 64 bit be a problem, provided you planned for it in advance? Name all the large, long-term projects that you know of that *haven't* gotten bitten by something like this. Now, name all of the large, long-term projects that you know of that HAVE gotten bitten repeatedly