Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-21 Thread Richard Loosemore
Benjamin Johnston wrote: First, I think there is a world of difference between passionate researchers at the beginning of the field, in 1956, and passionate researchers in 2008 who have a half-century of other people's mistakes to learn from. The secret of success is to try and fail, then

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-21 Thread Stephen Reed
Matt said: General intelligences are going to have to compete with organizations of specialized systems, each of which is optimized for a narrow task. Interesting observation. I envision Texai as a multitude of specialized agents arranged in hierarchical control system, and acting in

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-20 Thread Benjamin Johnston
First, I think there is a world of difference between passionate researchers at the beginning of the field, in 1956, and passionate researchers in 2008 who have a half-century of other people's mistakes to learn from. The secret of success is to try and fail, then to try again with a fresh

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-18 Thread Richard Loosemore
Benjamin Johnston wrote: I have stuck my neck out and written an Open Letter to AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) Investors on my website at http://susaro.com. All part of a campaign to get this field jumpstarted. Next week I am going to put up a road map for my own development project.

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-18 Thread Richard Loosemore
Mark Waser wrote: Richard Loosemore wrote: To say to an investor that AGI would be useful because we could use them to build travel agents and receptionists is to utter something completely incoherent. Not at all. It is catering to their desires and refraining from forcibly educating them.

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-17 Thread Nikolay Ognyanov
IMHO : The stated expected benefit of AGI development is overly ambitious on the sciencetechnology side and not ambitious enough on the socialeconomy side. For AGI to become the Next Big Thing it does not really have to come up with the best medical researcher. Nor would a great medical

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-17 Thread Richard Loosemore
Nikolay Ognyanov wrote: IMHO : The stated expected benefit of AGI development is overly ambitious on the sciencetechnology side and not ambitious enough on the socialeconomy side. For AGI to become the Next Big Thing it does not really have to come up with the best medical researcher. Nor would

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-17 Thread J Storrs Hall, PhD
On Thursday 17 April 2008 04:47:41 am, Richard Loosemore wrote: If you could build a (completely safe, I am assuming) system that could think in *every* way as powerfully as a human being, what would you teach it to become: 1) A travel Agent. 2) A medical researcher who could learn to

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-17 Thread Richard Loosemore
J Storrs Hall, PhD wrote: On Thursday 17 April 2008 04:47:41 am, Richard Loosemore wrote: If you could build a (completely safe, I am assuming) system that could think in *every* way as powerfully as a human being, what would you teach it to become: 1) A travel Agent. 2) A medical

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-17 Thread Mark Waser
So IMHO if you want to sell AGI to investors you better start with replacing travel agents, brokers, receptionists, personal assistants etc. etc. rather than researchers. I'm sorry, but this makes no sense at all: this is a complete negation of what AGI means. Actually . . . . sorry,

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-17 Thread J Storrs Hall, PhD
Well, I haven't seen any intelligent responses to this so I'll answer it myself: On Thursday 17 April 2008 06:29:20 am, J Storrs Hall, PhD wrote: On Thursday 17 April 2008 04:47:41 am, Richard Loosemore wrote: If you could build a (completely safe, I am assuming) system that could think in

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-17 Thread Ben Goertzel
We may well see a variety of proto-AGI applications in different domains, sorta midway between narrow-AI and human-level AGI, including stuff like -- maidbots -- AI financial traders that don't just execute machine learning algorithms, but grok context, adapt to regime changes, etc.

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-17 Thread Ben Goertzel
Hmmm... It's pretty hard to project the timing of different early-stage AGI applications, as this depends on the particular route taken to AGI, and there are many possible routes... We may well see a variety of proto-AGI applications in different domains, sorta midway between narrow-AI and

Re: [agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-17 Thread Benjamin Johnston
letter to investors. -Ben --- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=101455710-f059c4

[agi] An Open Letter to AGI Investors

2008-04-16 Thread Richard Loosemore
I have stuck my neck out and written an Open Letter to AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) Investors on my website at http://susaro.com. All part of a campaign to get this field jumpstarted. Next week I am going to put up a road map for my own development project. Richard Loosemore