(I'm kind of busy with personal matters... so will be brief)
I want to know where can we have an AGI project that allows
collaboration, and is also commercial?
I think many of the other AI communities are strongly academical.
This list is slightly different in that respect.
YKY
> "You would require visual intelligence to build these nanobots."
Not necessarily visual, but spatial. They are not synonymous.
> "It is impossible to bootstrap perceptual grounding from a purely symbolic
AGI. It does not know how to build 3D robots."
Ah-ah-ah... be careful here, remember the b
Joshua,
On 4/23/08, Joshua Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To return to the old question of why AGI research seems so rare,
> Samsonovich et al. say (
> http://members.cox.net/alexei.v.samsonovich/samsonovich_workshop.pdf)
>
> 'In fact, there are several scientific communities pursuing the sam
Ben Goertzel wrote:
I wouldn't agree with such a strong statement. I think the grounding
of ratiocination in image-ination is characteristic of human
intelligence, and must thus be characteristic of any highly human-like
intelligent system ... but, I don't see any reason to believe it's the
ONLY
Ben/Joshua:
How do you think the AI and AGI fields relate to the embodied & grounded
cognition movements in cog. sci? My impression is that the majority of
people here (excluding you) still have only limited awareness of them - &
are still operating in total & totally doomed defiance of their
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben/Joshua:
>
> How do you think the AI and AGI fields relate to the embodied & grounded
> cognition movements in cog. sci? My impression is that the majority of
> people here (excluding you) still have only limited awaren
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Joshua Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To return to the old question of why AGI research seems so rare, Samsonovich
> et al. say
> (http://members.cox.net/alexei.v.samsonovich/samsonovich_workshop.pdf)
>
> 'In fact, there are several scientific communities pursui
As usual, it is a matter of degree --- each of the communities Alexei
listed has some similarity with AGI in the research goals and
techniques explored, but at the same time, there are noticeable
differences in the assumptions and focuses, which are not merely a
difference in name.
Given what is g
To return to the old question of why AGI research seems so rare, Samsonovich
et al. say (
http://members.cox.net/alexei.v.samsonovich/samsonovich_workshop.pdf)
'In fact, there are several scientific communities pursuing the same or
similar goals, each unified under their own unique slogan: "machin
