- Original Message -
From: Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Environments and Languages for AGI [WAS Re: [agi] My proposal
for an AGI agenda]
when someone gets a clue about what they are trying to build, and
--- Chuck Esterbrook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/24/07, rooftop8000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one chooses a
decent option and gets on with it.
-- Ben
That's exactly the problem.. everyone just builds their
own ideas and doesn't consider how their ideas and code could
- Original Message -
From: Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 1:46 PM
Subject: Environments and Languages for AGI [WAS Re: [agi] My proposal for
an AGI agenda]
As for all the other talk on this list, recently, about programming
David Clark wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 1:46 PM
Subject: Environments and Languages for AGI [WAS Re: [agi] My proposal for
an AGI agenda]
As for all the other talk on this list, recently,
Ben Goertzel wrote:
Mark Waser wrote:
IMO, creating an AGI isn't really a programming problem. The hard
part is knowing exactly what to program.
Which is why it turns into a programming problem . . . . I
started out as a biochemist studying enzyme kinetics. The only
reasonable way
As for all the other talk on this list, recently, about programming
languages and the need for math, etc., I find myself amused by the
irrelevance of most of it: when someone gets a clue about what they
are trying to build, and why, the question of what language (or
environment) they
one chooses a
decent option and gets on with it.
-- Ben
That's exactly the problem.. everyone just builds their
own ideas and doesn't consider how their ideas and code could
(later) be used by other people
On 3/24/07, rooftop8000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one chooses a
decent option and gets on with it.
-- Ben
That's exactly the problem.. everyone just builds their
own ideas and doesn't consider how their ideas and code could
(later) be used by other people
If Novamente reaches human like,
Ben Goertzel wrote:
Richard Loosemore wrote:
As for all the other talk on this list, recently, about programming
languages and the need for math, etc., I find myself amused by the
irrelevance of most of it: when someone gets a clue about what they
are trying to build, and why, the question
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Ben Goertzel wrote:
Richard Loosemore wrote:
As for all the other talk on this list, recently, about programming
languages and the need for math, etc., I find myself amused by the
irrelevance of most of it: when someone gets a clue about what they
are trying to
rooftop8000 wrote:
one chooses a
decent option and gets on with it.
-- Ben
That's exactly the problem.. everyone just builds their
own ideas and doesn't consider how their ideas and code could
(later) be used by other people
I'm not at all sure something like AGI is well-suited to
11 matches
Mail list logo
