3. I think it is extremely important, that we give an AGI no bias about
space and time as we seem to have. Our intuitive understanding of space and
time is useful for our life on earth but it is completely wrong as we know
from theory of relativity and quantum physics.
-Matthias Heger
Well, for the purpose of creating the first human-level AGI, it seems
important **to**
wire in humanlike bias about space and time ... this will greatly ease the
task of
teaching the system to use our language and communicate with us effectively...
The same thing occurred to me while browsing
Matthias: I think it is extremely important, that we give an AGI no bias
about
space and time as we seem to have.
Well, I ( possibly Ben) have been talking about an entity that is in many
places at once - not in NO place. I have no idea how you would swing that -
other than what we already
Mike Tintner wrote:
Matthias: I think it is extremely important, that we give an AGI no bias
about
space and time as we seem to have.
Well, I ( possibly Ben) have been talking about an entity that is in
many places at once - not in NO place. I have no idea how you would
swing that - other
.listbox.com
Betreff: Re: [agi] I Can't Be In Two Places At Once.
Matthias: I think it is extremely important, that we give an AGI no bias
about
space and time as we seem to have.
Well, I ( possibly Ben) have been talking about an entity that is in many
places at once - not in NO place. I have no idea
yah, I discuss this in chapter 2 of The Hidden Pattern ;-) ...
the short of it is: the self-model of such a mind will be radically
different than that of a current human, because we create our self-models
largely by analogy to our physical organisms ...
intelligences w/o fixed physical
I think either way - computers or robots - a distributed entity has to be
looking at the world from different POV's more or less simultaneously, even if
rapidly switching. My immediate intuitive response is that that would make the
entity much less self-ish -much more open to merging or uniting
