The overall architecture is what is needed, the glue to hold the modules
together.
Lots of talk has been goign on about the Narrow AI pieces being used to build
complete AGI. We will not be able to use much of any of the pieces directly in
the core AGI, unless as Ben says they are modeled for
EDI must admit, I have never heard cortical column described as
containing 10^5 neurons. The figure I have commonly seen is 10^2 neurons
for a cortical column, although my understanding is that the actual number
could be either less or more. I guess the 10^5 figure would relate to
so-called
Benjamin,
Nearly any AGI component can be used within a narrow AI,
That proves my point [that AGI project can be successfully split
into smaller narrow AI subprojects], right?
but, the problem is, it's usually a bunch easier to make narrow AI's
using components that don't have any AGI
Matt,
--- Dennis Gorelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you describe a piece of technology that simultaneously:
- Is required for AGI.
- Cannot be required part of any useful narrow AI.
A one million CPU cluster.
Are you claiming that computational power of human brain is equivalent
to one
Nearly any AGI component can be used within a narrow AI,
That proves my point [that AGI project can be successfully split
into smaller narrow AI subprojects], right?
Yes, but it's a largely irrelevant point. Because building a narrow-AI
system in an AGI-compatible way is HARDER than
--- Dennis Gorelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
--- Dennis Gorelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you describe a piece of technology that simultaneously:
- Is required for AGI.
- Cannot be required part of any useful narrow AI.
A one million CPU cluster.
Are you claiming that
