A while back Rob Sperry posted a link to a video
of a presentation by Robert Hecht-Nielsen.
( http://inc2.ucsd.edu/inc_videos/ )
In it he claims to have worked out how the brain
thinks :) I didn't look at it at the time as it's
150MB+ and only had a dial up account, but checked
it out the other
Well the short gist of this guy's spiel is that Lenat is on the right track. The key
is to accumulate terabytes of stupid, temporally forward associations between elements.
A little background check reveals that this guy isn't a complete nutcase. He's got
some publications (but not many),
Hi Ben,
If Novababies are going to play and learn in a simulated world which is
most likely based on an agent-based/object-orientated programming
foundation, would it be useful for the basic Novamente to have prebuilt
capacity for agent-based modelling? Would this in be necessary if a
Hi,
This kind of built-in capability certainly isn't *necessary* but it might be
useful. This kind of issue is definitely worth exploring...
More thoughts later ;-)
ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Philip Sutton
Sent: Saturday, July
Brad Wyble wrote:
Well the short gist of this guy's spiel is that Lenat is on
the right track.
My understanding was that he argues that Lenat is on the wrong
track! Lenat is trying to accumulate a large body of relatively
high level logical rules about the world. This is very hard to
do and
- Original Message -
From: TERESA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: William Gallo [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WilliamRussellMorley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sandy Allonen [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Chris Brindley [EMAIL PROTECTED]; steve davis [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Donnell Morse [EMAIL PROTECTED]; TERESA MORSE
[EMAIL
