Google Glory/Prudence Providence/Faith Grace/Beauty Tranquility/Ecstasy to
see about a hundred of these postings spammed all over the Internet since
2001. They are always the same stuff rebranded as a new unified theory for
psychology, spirituality, classifying emotions, decoding mental illness,
lol.. well said richard.
the stimuli simply invokes no signiticant response and thus our brain
concludes that we 'don't know'. that's why it takes no effort to realize it.
agi algorithms should be built in a similar way, rather than searching.
Isn't this a bit of a no-brainer? Why would the
On 7/29/08, Benjamin Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the failure in this argument at step 2. Cybersex is a kind of erotic
interaction. Erotic interactions are often called sex in general
conversation, even though there are many kinds of erotic interactions that
don't result in the
I believe the human brain, in addition to including the controller for a
physical robot, includes the controller of a thought robot which includes
pushing much of the brain through learned or instinctual mental behaviors.
My understanding is that much of higher level function of this thought
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 03:08:55 am Valentina Poletti wrote:
lol.. well said richard.
the stimuli simply invokes no signiticant response and thus our brain
concludes that we 'don't know'. that's why it takes no effort to realize
it. agi algorithms should be built in a similar way, rather than
There is nothing at all spam-like about publicizing a new and worthy
addition to global knowledge and harmony.
Instead of your ad hominem insinuations, why not focus on the issues and
enlighten me
as to where this new system is not valid or sound, if you can ??
John E. LaMuth
BAMA JAMA
This is not a hard problem. A model for data compression has the task of
predicting the next bit in a string of unknown origin. If the string is an
encoding of natural language text, then modeling is an AI problem. If the model
doesn't know, then it assigns a probability of about 1/2 to each of
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
All,
Here's a question for you:
What does fomlepung mean?
If your immediate (mental) response was I don't know. it means
you're not a slang-slinging Norwegian. But, how did your brain
produce that feeling of not knowing? And, how did it
James,
So, you agree that some sort of search must take place before the feeling of
not knowing presents itself? Of course, realizing we don't have a lot of
information results from some type of a search and not a separate process (at
least you didn't posit any).
Thanks for your comments!
Valentina,
Well, the LOL is on you.
Richard failed to add anything new to the two previous responses that each
posited linguistic surface feature analysis as being responsible for generate
the feeling of not knowing with that *particular* (and, admittedly
poorly-chosen) example query. This
Ed,
Thanks for the response. I'm going to read it a couple more times to make sure
I didn't miss anything. But, on first read, looks good!
Thanks for taking the time to comment in such detail!
Cheers,
Brad
Ed Porter wrote:
I believe the human brain, in addition to including the
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 04:12:27 pm Brad Paulsen wrote:
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
All,
Here's a question for you:
What does fomlepung mean?
If your immediate (mental) response was I don't know. it means
you're not a slang-slinging Norwegian. But, how did
Saying that
cybersex is a kind of sex
is similar to saying
phone sex is a kind of sex
oral sex is a kind of sex
anal sex is a kind of sex
group sex is a kind of sex
or
penguin is a kind of bird
It seems pretty uncontroversial...
It's true that cybersex is a
John LaMuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
There is nothing at all spam-like about publicizing a new and worthy
addition to global knowledge and harmony.
Publicize it on your own websites. People can find it if they want. You
don't have to repeatedly post the same stuff over and over to a bunch
14 matches
Mail list logo
