On Sunday 14 September 2008, Dimitry Volfson wrote:
Well, then I don't understand what you're looking for.
Brain chemistry is part of the model.
Check out one of the sentences:
The thalamus in the limbic system ('leopard brain') converts the
physical need into an urge within the cortex.
So
Actually, I remember reading something about scientists finding a list
structure in the brain of a bird singing a song (a moving pointer to the
next item in a list sort of thing). But whatever.
It's not a very low level model, but the lower level activation is implied.
When you imagine a
Matt,
Thanks for the paper. Some random comments:
*. If RSI is possible, then it is critical that the initial goals of
the first iteration of agents (seed AI) are friendly to humans and
that the goals not drift through successive iterations.
As I commented on Ben's paper recently, here the
BTW, if any AGI projects would like to incorporate my ideas, feel free
to do so, and I'd like to get involved too!
YKY
---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your
Found this while grepping thru tons of posts on linguistlist
(19.2502). Could be of interest.
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:39:46
From: Kerstin Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Usage-based Computational Language Acquisition
E-mail this message to a friend:
On Sunday 14 September 2008, Dimitry Volfson wrote:
Actually, I remember reading something about scientists finding a
list structure in the brain of a bird singing a song (a moving
pointer to the next item in a list sort of thing). But whatever.
That does sound interesting, yes, I'd like to
On Sunday 14 September 2008, Pei Wang wrote:
There is no guaranteed improvement in an open system.
On this note, somebody suggested I reread Wolfram's NKS pg 340~
yesterday. It was around this section of his book that he mentions his
lack of optimism in iteration to bring about 'improvement'
Pei, thanks for the comments. I posted an updated version of the paper to
http://www.mattmahoney.net/rsi.pdf
I also found a bug in my RSI program and posted a revised version (which is
also easier to read). My original program did not depend on input t, so
according to my definition, it did
