weak as some things (like deep dish math) and Ben is considerably
ahead of, and more knowledgable than, me.
Edward W. Porter
Porter Associates
24 String Bridge S12
Exeter, NH 03833
(617) 494-1722
Fax (617) 494-1822
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL
a
compelling financial pitch.
John
From: Edward W. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin,
I am an evangelist for the fact that the time for powerful AI could be
here very rapidly if there were reasonable funding for the right people.
There is a small, but increasing number of people
] What best evidence for fast AI?
On 11/10/07, Edward W. Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Goertzel and his Novamente is best architect/architecture I know
of. I had independently come with a similar approach myself (I could
have written 80-85% of that summary of Novamente's architecture
Ben said -- the possibility of dramatic, rapid, shocking success in
robotics is LOWER
than in cognition
That's why I tell people the value of manual labor will not be impacted as
soon by the AGI revolution as the value of mind labor.
Ed Porter
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin
doesn't have the same basis of knowledge to form detailed comments on NM,
that Mark does.
-- Ben
On Nov 12, 2007 11:35 AM, Edward W. Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry. I guess I did misunderstand you.
If you have time I wish you could state the reasons why you find it
lacking
Response to Mark Waser Mon 11/12/2007 2:42 PM post.
MARK Remember that the brain is *massively* parallel. Novamente and
any other linear (or minorly-parallel) system is *not* going to work in
the same fashion as the brain. Novamente can be parallelized to some
degree but *not* to anywhere
evidence for fast AI?
I think that there are two basic directions to better the Novamente
architecture:
the one Mark talks about
more integration of MOSES with PLN and RL theory
On 11/13/07, Edward W. Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Response to Mark Waser Mon 11/12/2007 2:42 PM post.
MARK
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
