Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-08 Thread wannabe
I don't know if it's low-hanging fruit, but it certainly seems like it
would require AGI to have a system that could given some picture or video
input, say what some object is.  And along those lines, accept verbal
instruction as to what it is if it's wrong in what it thinks.  I bring
that up because I'm trying to get through a book on formal semantics
called _What is Meaning?_, and I've been really struck that there clearly
is some ability to call things however we call them, but I surely don't
see how it's done.  It does not seem like it could be a simple thing.  And
we do call things by different names according to context and need.
andi


On Sat, August 7, 2010 9:10 pm, Ben Goertzel wrote:
 Hi,

 A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
 out to you guys

 
 I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
 hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
 involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
 voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
 Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

 Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
 under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
 welcome.
 

 All serious responses will be appreciated!!

 Also, I would be grateful if we
 could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
 question, rather than
 digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition
 of AGI
 versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
 etc.  If you think
 the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
 fine, but please
 start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

 If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a
 compact
 list to convey to him

 Thanks!
 Ben G


 ---
 agi
 Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
 Modify Your Subscription:
 https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com





---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-08 Thread deepakjnath
1. Basic object recognition can be used in camera phones to identify people
in front or objects in front. This can be used by blind people to navigate
their environment better.

2. AGI expert systems can be used to diagnose diseases.

thanks,
Deepak


On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:

 Hi,

 A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
 out to you guys

 
 I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
 hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
 involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
 voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
 Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

 Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
 under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
 welcome.
 

 All serious responses will be appreciated!!

 Also, I would be grateful if we
 could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
 question, rather than
 digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition
 of AGI
 versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
 etc.  If you think
 the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
 fine, but please
 start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

 If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a
 compact
 list to convey to him

 Thanks!
 Ben G


 ---
 agi
 Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
 Modify Your Subscription:
 https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com




-- 
cheers,
Deepak



---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-08 Thread Ian Parker
Just one point about Forex, your first entry. This is purely a time series
analysis as I understand it. It is narrow AI in fact. With AGI you would
expect interviews with the executives of listed companies, just as the big
investment houses do.

AGI would be data mining of everything about a company as well as time
series analysis.


  - Ian Parker

On 8 August 2010 02:35, Abram Demski abramdem...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ben,

 -The oft-mentioned stock-market prediction;
 -data mining, especially for corporate data such as customer behavior,
 sales prediction, etc;
 -decision support systems;
 -personal assistants;
 -chatbots (think, an ipod that talks to you when you are lonely);
 -educational uses including human-like artificial teachers, but also
 including smart presentation-of-material software which decides what
 practice problem to ask you next, when to give tips, etc;
 -industrial design (engineering);
 ...

 Good luck to him!

 --Abram

 On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:

 Hi,

 A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
 out to you guys

 
 I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
 hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
 involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
 voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
 Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

 Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
 under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
 welcome.
 

 All serious responses will be appreciated!!

 Also, I would be grateful if we
 could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
 question, rather than
 digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition
 of AGI
 versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
 etc.  If you think
 the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
 fine, but please
 start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

 If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a
 compact
 list to convey to him

 Thanks!
 Ben G


 ---
 agi
 Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com




 --
 Abram Demski
 http://lo-tho.blogspot.com/
 http://groups.google.com/group/one-logic
*agi* | Archives https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ | 
 Modifyhttps://www.listbox.com/member/?;Your Subscription
 http://www.listbox.com




---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Stocks; was Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-08 Thread Abram Demski
Ian,

Be courteous-- Ben asked specifically that any arguments about which things
are narrow-ai should start a separate topic.

Yea, I did not intend to rule out any possible sources of information for
the stock market prediction task. Ben has worked on a system which looked on
the web for chatter about specific companies, for example.

Even if it was just stock data being used, it wouldn't be just time-series
analysis. It would at least be planning as well. Really, though, it includes
acting with the behavior of potential adversaries in mind (like
game-playing).

Even if it *were* just time-series analysis, though, I think it would be a
decent AGI application. That is because I think AGI technology should be
good at time-series analysis! In my opinion, a good AGI learning algorithm
should be useful for such tasks.

So, yes, many of my examples could be attacked via narrow AI; but I think
they would be handled *better* by AGI. That's why they are low-hanging
fruit-- they are (hopefully) on the border.

--Abram

On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Ian Parker ianpark...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just one point about Forex, your first entry. This is purely a time series
 analysis as I understand it. It is narrow AI in fact. With AGI you would
 expect interviews with the executives of listed companies, just as the big
 investment houses do.

 AGI would be data mining of everything about a company as well as time
 series analysis.


   - Ian Parker

 On 8 August 2010 02:35, Abram Demski abramdem...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ben,

 -The oft-mentioned stock-market prediction;
 -data mining, especially for corporate data such as customer behavior,
 sales prediction, etc;
 -decision support systems;
 -personal assistants;
 -chatbots (think, an ipod that talks to you when you are lonely);
 -educational uses including human-like artificial teachers, but also
 including smart presentation-of-material software which decides what
 practice problem to ask you next, when to give tips, etc;
 -industrial design (engineering);
 ...

 Good luck to him!

 --Abram

 On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:

 Hi,

 A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
 out to you guys

 
 I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
 hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
 involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
 voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
 Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

 Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
 under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
 welcome.
 

 All serious responses will be appreciated!!

 Also, I would be grateful if we
 could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
 question, rather than
 digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition
 of AGI
 versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
 etc.  If you think
 the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
 fine, but please
 start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

 If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a
 compact
 list to convey to him

 Thanks!
 Ben G


 ---
 agi
 Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com




 --
 Abram Demski
 http://lo-tho.blogspot.com/
 http://groups.google.com/group/one-logic
*agi* | Archives https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ | 
 Modifyhttps://www.listbox.com/member/?;Your Subscription
 http://www.listbox.com


*agi* | Archives https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ | 
 Modifyhttps://www.listbox.com/member/?;Your Subscription
 http://www.listbox.com




-- 
Abram Demski
http://lo-tho.blogspot.com/
http://groups.google.com/group/one-logic



---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-08 Thread Steve Richfield
Ben

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:

 I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps.


There is interesting hidden value in some stuff. In the case of Dr. Eliza,
it provide a communication pathway to sick people, which is EXACTLY what a
research institution needs to support itself.

I think you may be on to something here - looking for high-value.

Steve



---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: Stocks; was Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-08 Thread Ian Parker
OK Ben is then one step ahead of Forex. Point is time series analysis,
although it is narrow AI can be extremely powerful. The situation about *
sentiment* is different from that of Poker where there is a single
adversary bluffing. A time series analysis encompasses the *ensemble* of
different opinions. Statistical programs can model this accurately.

Ben presumably has techniques for mining the data about companies. The
difficulty, as I see it, of translating this into a stock exchange
prediction is the weighting of different factors. What in fact you will need
to complete the task is something like conjoint analysis.

We need, for example, to get an index for innovation. We can see
how important this is and how important other factors are by doing something
like conjoint analysis. Management will affect long term stock values. Forex
is concerned with day to day fluctuations where management performance
(except in terms of the manipulation of shares) is not important.

Conjoint analysis has been used by managements to indicate how they should
be managing. Ben should be able to tell managements how they can optimise
the value of their company based on historical data.

This is real AGI and there is a close tie up between prediction and how a
company should be managed. We know as a matter of historical record, for
example, that where you have to reduce a budget deficit you do it with 2
parts reduction in public expenditure and 1 part rise in taxation. The
Con/Lib Dem coalition is going for a 3:1 ratio. There will no double be
other things that will come out of data-mining.

Sorry no disrespect intended.

On 8 August 2010 18:09, Abram Demski abramdem...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ian,

 Be courteous-- Ben asked specifically that any arguments about which things
 are narrow-ai should start a separate topic.

 Yea, I did not intend to rule out any possible sources of information for
 the stock market prediction task. Ben has worked on a system which looked on
 the web for chatter about specific companies, for example.

 Even if it was just stock data being used, it wouldn't be just time-series
 analysis. It would at least be planning as well. Really, though, it includes
 acting with the behavior of potential adversaries in mind (like
 game-playing).

 Even if it *were* just time-series analysis, though, I think it would be a
 decent AGI application. That is because I think AGI technology should be
 good at time-series analysis! In my opinion, a good AGI learning algorithm
 should be useful for such tasks.

 So, yes, many of my examples could be attacked via narrow AI; but I think
 they would be handled *better* by AGI. That's why they are low-hanging
 fruit-- they are (hopefully) on the border.

 --Abram

 On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Ian Parker ianpark...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just one point about Forex, your first entry. This is purely a time series
 analysis as I understand it. It is narrow AI in fact. With AGI you would
 expect interviews with the executives of listed companies, just as the big
 investment houses do.

 AGI would be data mining of everything about a company as well as time
 series analysis.


   - Ian Parker

 On 8 August 2010 02:35, Abram Demski abramdem...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ben,

 -The oft-mentioned stock-market prediction;
 -data mining, especially for corporate data such as customer behavior,
 sales prediction, etc;
 -decision support systems;
 -personal assistants;
 -chatbots (think, an ipod that talks to you when you are lonely);
 -educational uses including human-like artificial teachers, but also
 including smart presentation-of-material software which decides what
 practice problem to ask you next, when to give tips, etc;
 -industrial design (engineering);
 ...

 Good luck to him!

 --Abram

 On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:

 Hi,

 A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
 out to you guys

 
 I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
 hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
 involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
 voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
 Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

 Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
 under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
 welcome.
 

 All serious responses will be appreciated!!

 Also, I would be grateful if we
 could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
 question, rather than
 digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the
 definition of AGI
 versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
 etc.  If you think
 the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
 fine, but please
 start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

 If the 

Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-07 Thread Matt Mahoney
Wouldn't it depend on the other researcher's area of expertise?

 -- Matt Mahoney, matmaho...@yahoo.com





From: Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org
To: agi agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sat, August 7, 2010 9:10:23 PM
Subject: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging 
fruit apps

Hi,

A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
out to you guys


I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
welcome.


All serious responses will be appreciated!!

Also, I would be grateful if we
could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
question, rather than
digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition of AGI
versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
etc.  If you think
the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
fine, but please
start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a compact
list to convey to him

Thanks!
Ben G


---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com



---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-07 Thread Ben Goertzel
His request explicitly said he is focusing on voice and vision.  I think
that is enough specificity...

ben

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Matt Mahoney matmaho...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Wouldn't it depend on the other researcher's area of expertise?


 -- Matt Mahoney, matmaho...@yahoo.com


 --
 *From:* Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org
 *To:* agi agi@v2.listbox.com
 *Sent:* Sat, August 7, 2010 9:10:23 PM
 *Subject:* [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low
 hanging fruit apps

 Hi,

 A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
 out to you guys

 
 I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
 hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
 involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
 voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
 Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

 Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
 under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
 welcome.
 

 All serious responses will be appreciated!!

 Also, I would be grateful if we
 could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
 question, rather than
 digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition
 of AGI
 versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
 etc.  If you think
 the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
 fine, but please
 start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

 If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a
 compact
 list to convey to him

 Thanks!
 Ben G


 ---
 agi
 Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
*agi* | Archives https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ | 
 Modifyhttps://www.listbox.com/member/?;Your Subscription
 http://www.listbox.com




-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
CEO, Novamente LLC and Biomind LLC
CTO, Genescient Corp
Vice Chairman, Humanity+
Advisor, Singularity University and Singularity Institute
External Research Professor, Xiamen University, China
b...@goertzel.org

I admit that two times two makes four is an excellent thing, but if we are
to give everything its due, two times two makes five is sometimes a very
charming thing too. -- Fyodor Dostoevsky



---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-07 Thread Abram Demski
Ben,

-The oft-mentioned stock-market prediction;
-data mining, especially for corporate data such as customer behavior, sales
prediction, etc;
-decision support systems;
-personal assistants;
-chatbots (think, an ipod that talks to you when you are lonely);
-educational uses including human-like artificial teachers, but also
including smart presentation-of-material software which decides what
practice problem to ask you next, when to give tips, etc;
-industrial design (engineering);
...

Good luck to him!

--Abram

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:

 Hi,

 A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
 out to you guys

 
 I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
 hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
 involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
 voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
 Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

 Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
 under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
 welcome.
 

 All serious responses will be appreciated!!

 Also, I would be grateful if we
 could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
 question, rather than
 digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition
 of AGI
 versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
 etc.  If you think
 the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
 fine, but please
 start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

 If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a
 compact
 list to convey to him

 Thanks!
 Ben G


 ---
 agi
 Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
 Modify Your Subscription:
 https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com




-- 
Abram Demski
http://lo-tho.blogspot.com/
http://groups.google.com/group/one-logic



---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-07 Thread Mike Tintner

Why don't you kick it off with a suggestion of your own?

(I think there are only lower/basic *robotic* AGI apps- and suggest no one 
will come up with any answers for you. Why don't you disprove me?)


--
From: Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 2:10 AM
To: agi agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low 
hanging fruit apps



Hi,

A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
out to you guys


I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
welcome.


All serious responses will be appreciated!!

Also, I would be grateful if we
could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
question, rather than
digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition 
of AGI

versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
etc.  If you think
the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
fine, but please
start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a 
compact

list to convey to him

Thanks!
Ben G


---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com 





---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-07 Thread David Jones
Hey Ben,

Faster, cheaper, and more robust 3D modeling for the movie industry. The
modeling allows different sources of video content to be extracted from
scenes, manipulated and mixed with others.

The movie industry has the money and motivation to extract data from images.
Making it easier, more robust and cheaper could drive innovation and
progress.

Why is it AGI-related? Because AGI requires knowledge. Knowledge can be
extracted from facts about the world. Facts can be extracted from images in
a general way using a limited set of algorithms and concepts.

Some say that computer vision is AI-complete and requires knowledge to do.
But, I have to disagree. Given sufficient data and good images from multiple
cameras or devices, unambiguous data can extract very accurate 3D models. If
this was AI-completed and required knowledge, that would not be possible.

Dave

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:

 Hi,

 A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
 out to you guys

 
 I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
 hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
 involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
 voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
 Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

 Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
 under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
 welcome.
 

 All serious responses will be appreciated!!

 Also, I would be grateful if we
 could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
 question, rather than
 digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition
 of AGI
 versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
 etc.  If you think
 the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
 fine, but please
 start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

 If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a
 compact
 list to convey to him

 Thanks!
 Ben G


 ---
 agi
 Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
 Modify Your Subscription:
 https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com




---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-07 Thread Russell Wallace
If you can do better voice recognition, that's a significant
application in its own right, as well as having uses in other
applications e.g. automated first layer for call centers.

If you can do better image/video recognition, there are a great many
uses for that -- look at all the things people are trying to use image
recognition for at the moment.

If you can do both at the same time, that's going to have plenty of
uses for filtering, classifying and searching video. (Imagine being
able to search the Youtube archives like you can search the Web today.
I would guess Google would pay a few bob for technology that could do
that.)

On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:
 Hi,

 A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
 out to you guys

 
 I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
 hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
 involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
 voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
 Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

 Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
 under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
 welcome.
 

 All serious responses will be appreciated!!

 Also, I would be grateful if we
 could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
 question, rather than
 digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition of 
 AGI
 versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
 etc.  If you think
 the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
 fine, but please
 start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

 If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a 
 compact
 list to convey to him

 Thanks!
 Ben G


 ---
 agi
 Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com



---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] Help requested: Making a list of (non-robotic) AGI low hanging fruit apps

2010-08-07 Thread Steve Richfield
Ben,

Dr. Eliza with the Gracie interface to Dragon NaturallySpeaking makes a
really spectacular speech I/O demo - when it works, which is ~50% of the
time. The other 50% of the time, it fails to recognize enough to run with,
misses something critical, etc., and just sounds stupid, kinda like most
doctors I know. Even when it fails, it still babbles on with domain-specific
comments.

Results are MUCH better when a person with speech I/O and chronic illness
experience operates it.

Note that Gracie handles interruptions and other violations of
conversational structure. Further, it speaks in 3 voices, one for the
expert, one for the assistant, and one for the environment and OS.

Note that the Microsoft standard speech I/O has a mouth control that moves
simultaneously with the sound, that is pasted on an egghead face, so you can
watch it speak.

Note that the speech recognition works AMAZINGLY well, because the ONLY
thing it is interested in are long technical words and relevant phrases, and
NOT in the short connecting words that are what usually gets messed up. When
you watch what was recognized during casual conversation, what you typically
see is gobbledygook between the important stuff, which comes shining
through.

There are plans to greatly enhance all this, but like everything else on
this forum, it suffers from inadequate resources. If someone is looking for
something that is demonstrable right now to throw even modest resources
into...

That program was then adapted to a web server by adding logic to sense when
it was on a server, whereupon some additional buttons appear to operate and
debug it in a server environment. That adapted program is now up and
running, without any of the speech I/O stuff, on http://www.DrEliza.com.

I know, it isn't AGI, but neither is anything else these days.

Any interest?

Steve

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:

 Hi,

 A fellow AGI researcher sent me this request, so I figured I'd throw it
 out to you guys

 
 I'm putting together an AGI pitch for investors and thinking of low
 hanging fruit applications to argue for. I'm intentionally not
 involving any mechanics (robots, moving parts, etc.). I'm focusing on
 voice (i.e. conversational agents) and perhaps vision-based systems.
 Hellen Keller AGI, if you will :)

 Along those lines, I'd like any ideas you may have that would fall
 under this description. I need to substantiate the case for such AGI
 technology by making an argument for high-value apps. All ideas are
 welcome.
 

 All serious responses will be appreciated!!

 Also, I would be grateful if we
 could keep this thread closely focused on direct answers to this
 question, rather than
 digressive discussions on Helen Keller, the nature of AGI, the definition
 of AGI
 versus narrow AI, the achievability or unachievability of AGI, etc.
 etc.  If you think
 the question is bad or meaningless or unclear or whatever, that's
 fine, but please
 start a new thread with a different subject line to make your point.

 If the discussion is useful, my intention is to mine the answers into a
 compact
 list to convey to him

 Thanks!
 Ben G


 ---
 agi
 Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
 Modify Your Subscription:
 https://www.listbox.com/member/?;
 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com




---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com