PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 5:31:16 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] organising parallel processes
Steve,
This may be a naive question, but have you considered using Skype as
a P2P mechanism?
The Skype User Agent (UA) software has been downloaded 100's of
millions
--- On Fri, 5/9/08, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:From: Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [agi]
organising parallel processes, try2To: agi@v2.listbox.comDate: Friday, May 9, 2008, 11:04 PMHi,The Texai system, as I envision its deployment, will have the following characteristics:a lot
- Original Message
From: rooftop8000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:35:49 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] organising parallel processes, try2
Do you think a hierarchy structure could be too restrictive?
No, I have not yet found a use case that would
I'll try to explain it more..
Suppose you have a lot of processes, all containing some production rule(s).
They communicate with messages. They all should get cpu time somehow. Some
processes just do low-level responses, some monitor other processes, etc. Some
are involved in looking at the
Artificial Intelligence Researcher
http://texai.org/blog
http://texai.org
3008 Oak Crest Ave.
Austin, Texas, USA 78704
512.791.7860
- Original Message
From: rooftop8000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 3:24:14 PM
Subject: [agi] organising parallel processes
On 5/4/08, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As perhaps you know, I want to organize Texai as a vast multitude of
agents situated in a hierarchical control system, grouped as possibly
redundant, load-sharing, agents within an agency sharing a specific
mission. I have given some thought to
Message
From: YKY (Yan King Yin) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2008 10:36:16 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] organising parallel processes
On 5/4/08, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As perhaps you know, I want to organize Texai as a vast multitude of agents
--- YKY (Yan King Yin) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/4/08, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As perhaps you know, I want to organize Texai as a vast multitude
of agents situated in a hierarchical control system, grouped as
possibly
redundant, load-sharing, agents within an agency
On 5/6/08, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the opposite of what you say I hope that my following
explanation will help converge our thinking. Let me first emphasize
that I plan a vast multitude of specialized agencies, in which each
agency has a particular
Stephen Reed wrote:
At the time that the Texai bootstrap English dialog system is
available, I'll begin fleshing out the hundreds of agencies for
which I hope to recruit human mentors. Each agency I establish will
have paragraphs of English text to describe its mission, including
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://paulspontifications.blogspot.com/2008/05/under-appreciated-fact-we-dont-know-how.html
Computer programming is an art, as Knuth observed.
I teach classes in C++, Java, and x86 assember. I can show my students
some simple drawings and show them how to hold a
The blog entry is amusing. I started writing software at quite young
age (about 10), and I always assumed that it was an art rather like
writing a novel or a musical composition. So when I grew older and
became employed to write programs I was shocked in my early career to
find that some people
PM
Subject: Re: [agi] organising parallel processes
Stephen Reed wrote:
At the time that the Texai bootstrap English dialog system is
available, I'll begin fleshing out the hundreds of agencies for
which I hope to recruit human mentors. Each agency I establish will
have paragraphs
, USA 78704
512.791.7860
- Original Message
From: Mike Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2008 12:26:43 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] organising parallel processes
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
be like Skype, the popular
--- Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt (or anyone else), have you gotten as far as thinking about NAT
hole punching or some other solution for peer-to-peer?
Yes, but NAT hole punching is not really a solution. I have a home
router/firewall/NAT that by default blocks all incoming
Message
From: Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2008 1:43:20 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] organising parallel processes
--- Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt (or anyone else), have you gotten as far as thinking about NAT
hole punching or some other
--- Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
I am glad you are looking deeply into the issue of how to deploy
vastly distributed AGI. I have some follow-up questions regarding
your informative comments.
...but NAT hole punching is not really a solution. I have a home
hi,
I have a lot of parallel processes that are in control of their own activation
(they can decide which processes are activated and for how long). I need some
kind of organisation (a simple example would be a hierarchy of processes that
only activate downwards).
I'm looking for examples of
I assume that you have checked out Hofstadters architecture mixing random
relevance (Fluid Analogies Research Group)?
Jean-Paul Van Belle
Associate Professor
Head: Postgraduate Section, Department of Information Systems
Research Associate: Centre for IT and National Development in Africa
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, rooftop8000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I have a lot of parallel processes that are in control of their own
activation (they can decide which processes are activated and for how long).
I need some kind of organisation (a simple example would be a hierarchy
rooftop8000 wrote:
hi,
I have a lot of parallel processes that are in control of their own activation (they can decide which processes are activated and for how long). I need some kind of organisation (a simple example would be a hierarchy of processes that only activate downwards).
I'm
Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, rooftop8000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I have a lot of parallel processes that are in control of their own activation
(they can decide which processes are activated and for how long). I need some
kind of organisation (a simple
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 7:16 PM, a [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what he is referring to is top-down cognitive control processes
that can observe and select competitive bottom-up stimuli.
But it's too general to say something and expect to answer the
question. Parallel processes that
--- rooftop8000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I have a lot of parallel processes that are in control of their own
activation (they can decide which processes are activated and for how
long). I need some kind of organisation (a simple example would be a
hierarchy of processes that only
, USA 78704
512.791.7860
- Original Message
From: Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2008 12:47:45 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] organising parallel processes
--- rooftop8000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I have a lot of parallel processes
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt (or anyone else), have you gotten as far as thinking about NAT hole
punching or some other solution for peer-to-peer?
NAT hole punching has no solution because it's not a problem you can
fix. If I administrate the
, May 4, 2008 9:41:16 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] organising parallel processes
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt (or anyone else), have you gotten as far as thinking about NAT hole
punching or some other solution for peer-to-peer?
NAT hole punching has
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
be like Skype, the popular non-scum Internet phone service that also
performs NAT hole punching (a.k.a. NAT traversal).
I was not aware Skype worked like that- thanks for the info. If you
are using a similar form of
28 matches
Mail list logo
