Thank you for your responses.
Jeff, I have taken your suggestion and sent a couple
questions to the Summit. My concern is motivated by
noticing that the Summit includes speakers who have
been very clear about their opposition to regulating
AI, but none who I am aware of who have advocated it
I am concerned that the Singularity Summit will not include
any speaker advocating government regulation of intelligent
machines. The purpose of this message is not to convince you
of the need for such regulation, but just to say that the
Summit should include someone speaking in favor of it. Note
- Original Message -
From: Bill Hibbard Subject: [agi] the Singularity Summit and regulation of
AI
I am concerned that the Singularity Summit will not include
any speaker advocating government regulation of intelligent
machines. The purpose of this message is not to convince you
of
On 5/10/06, Bill Hibbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am concerned that the Singularity Summit will not include
any speaker advocating government regulation of intelligent
machines. The purpose of this message is not to convince you
of the need for such regulation, but just to say that the
Summit
On 5/10/06, Bill Hibbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Singularity Summit should include all points ofview, including advocates for regulation of intelligentmachines. It will weaken the Summit to exclude thispoint of view.
Then it would be better if the Summit were not held at all. Nanotech,
AGI
