For example, a question to Ben - Novamente is designed to achieve
complex goals in complex environment but what goals in what
environments should it achieve before you can call it a 100% complete
AGI?
Well, it's clear that truly general intelligence is possible only under
conditions of
Well it seems more important to create some practical but imprecise
formula rather than a strict mathematical definition - offering as
much insight as a highly intelligent human is a good way to put it
and something which can be verified. However aren't we limiting
ourselves and making the task
From: Dmitri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how is the problem of defining intelligence handled by various
acclaimed authors? I only know about the Turing test but that's only
one possible way and one which is quite impractical.
I have a brief summary of the definitions, as I see them, in the Section
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:40:41 +0300, Dmitri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My personal opinion is that general intelligence is a lot more than
anything of the above but I cannot find a good criterion/definition of
AGI.
There is probably not one absolute definition. Humans themselves have
a
What I'd like to see are reasonably powerful theorems of the form:
In order to display general intelligence of level L according to definition
G, using computational resources R, a system must display structures S and
dynamics D.
I'll be content that a definition of general intelligence is
At 18:40 2005-03-24 Dmitri wrote:
My personal opinion is that general intelligence is a lot more than
anything of the above but I cannot find a good criterion/definition of
AGI.
Why do you need a definition?
Also, how is the problem of defining intelligence handled by various
acclaimed
Well it seems more important to create some practical but imprecise
formula rather than a strict mathematical definition - offering as
much insight as a highly intelligent human is a good way to put it
and something which can be verified. However aren't we limiting
ourselves and making the
Well, if someone has a goal of creating artifical intelligence, he has
to find a way to determine when the goal is achieved, otherwise
creating artificial intelligence is the same as creating something
I don't know what.
However to me it is more interesting not to find an single exact
definition
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:45:42PM -0500, Martin Striz wrote:
There is probably not one absolute definition. Humans themselves have
a repertoire of domain-specific cognitive adaptations coupled with a
limited ability at general problem solving, but we classify ourselves
as general
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:00:19AM +0300, Dmitri wrote:
Well, if someone has a goal of creating artifical intelligence, he has
to find a way to determine when the goal is achieved, otherwise
creating artificial intelligence is the same as creating something
I don't know what.
This has
10 matches
Mail list logo
