Pei, you classified NARS as a principle-based AI. Are there any others in
that category? What about Novamente?
-- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message
From: Pei Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 11:51:58 AM
Of course, I know many people won't agree with my classification, and
many projects are pursuing multiple goals, according to this
classification. One example is Novamente --- Ben wants (almost)
everything. ;-)
In the following webpage I just updated, you can see where I put some
representative
According to your classification,
structure (e.g., to build brain models)
behavior (e.g., to simulate human mind)
capability (e.g., to solve hard problems)
function (e.g., to have cognitive facilities)
principle (e.g., to be adaptive and rational)
Novamente is based on the final 3 categories,
On 11/18/06, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to your classification,
structure (e.g., to build brain models)
behavior (e.g., to simulate human mind)
capability (e.g., to solve hard problems)
function (e.g., to have cognitive facilities)
principle (e.g., to be adaptive and
Agree, too --- that is why I said you want almost everything. However,
whenever a design decision is made, you usually consider more about
the system's problem-solving ability, and less about the consistency
of its theoretical foundation --- of course, you may argue that it
don't conflict with
So you are moving in the right direction. ;-)
Pei
On 11/18/06, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agree, too --- that is why I said you want almost everything. However,
whenever a design decision is made, you usually consider more about
the system's problem-solving ability, and less
But of course, practical ability is the foremost thing in my mind when
working on AGI design ... my point is just that I will definitely make
small sacrifices in the practical ability of particular system
components in order to increase the simplicity and principledness of
the overall design.
Hi Pei,
Just finished reading your Rigid Flexibility book; it's a nice summary of
your approach.
I can recommend it to anyone interested in AGI: If you agree with Pei's
general approach it provides quite a bit a detail; if you disagree, it
provides a coherent reference point.
Peter
Peter,
Thanks!
I look forward to the day when you can tell us more about a2i2. :-)
Pei
On 11/17/06, Peter Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pei,
Just finished reading your Rigid Flexibility book; it's a nice summary of
your approach.
I can recommend it to anyone interested in AGI: If you
That'll be when you join our project...
... or buy our product... :)
-Original Message-
From: Pei Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter,
Thanks!
I look forward to the day when you can tell us more about a2i2. :-)
Pei
On 11/17/06, Peter Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pei,
10 matches
Mail list logo
