Paul P
wrote:
***
That "I" have not demonstrated precise
definitions to the phenomenon of life or the phenomenon of intelligence is not a
proper argument that you are right about the possibility of computer
life.
***
Of course it isn't an argument that I'm
right.
If by "prove" you're
I
wrote
***
There is a difference between Novamente
and abstractions about Novamente
There is a difference
between my brain and abstractions about my brain
A
computer running aNovamente software system is not an abstraction, nor is
my brain
Both
a computer running aNovamente system,
Shane Legg wrote:
Whose to say what intelligence *really* is. My approach is simply
to try to define something that captures with precision aspects of
the fuzzy concept of intelligence, name it something else, and then
get on with the job. If nobody/everybody thinks that what I have
