Re: [agi] Re: AGI speedrun continues

2020-02-13 Thread stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI
@WriterOfMinds: I'm already happy when anyone listens :-D I'll keep putting out long and short vids, no worries. Thanks Some more hardcore stuff was made today.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-WHXNWw5bg -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permal

Re: [agi] My state of mind.

2020-02-13 Thread stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI
Something has been censored? What? -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T234cfbcefa1d1d24-Mf3cf43f9083d855db15b0198 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Re: [agi] Re: AGI speedrun continues

2020-02-13 Thread stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI
I have to do the long streams in order to give myself the energy to complete certain tasks. Even if people watch only a bit of it, that's completely fine. It's also a sort of proof-of-work I guess. -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: ht

Re: [agi] Re: Test your knowledge of probability theory

2020-02-13 Thread James Bowery
I've not seen that assertion made about QM before. Cite? On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 6:19 PM Matt Mahoney wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020, 4:49 PM Jim Bromer wrote: > >> If you flipped a coin and it came up heads then the probability that it >> came up heads is 1. >> Was that a trick question? >

Re: [agi] My state of mind.

2020-02-13 Thread Alan Grimes via AGI
James Bowery wrote: > Algorithmic Justice League   > "Join the Algorithmic Justice League in the movement towards equitable > and accountable AI." [insert expressions of shock and horor.] Well, at least the enemy is operating out in the open... I think it is a prett

Re: [agi] Re: Test your knowledge of probability theory

2020-02-13 Thread Matt Mahoney
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020, 8:45 AM James Bowery wrote: > I've not seen that assertion made about QM before. Cite? > That's my interpretation of Everett's interpretation. I think the Copenhagen interpretation, that a wave collapses into a particle the instant it is observed, is wrong. Schrodinger sho

Re: [agi] Re: Real AGI Brain

2020-02-13 Thread Matt Mahoney
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020, 8:06 PM James Bowery wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:44 PM Matt Mahoney > wrote: > >> >> >> Here is versions 1.2.0.87b of my recursively self improving AGI. This >> hopefully fixes a bug in the module that detects when it is about to launch >> an unfriendly singularity.

[agi] Re: This Professor’s ‘Amazing’ Trick Makes Quadratic Equations Easier

2020-02-13 Thread Jim Bromer
I wasn't going to spend much time on this but the problem may be more subtle than you seem to appreciate. The solution for one or two points on a curve contains less information than the equation of the curve. And that made me realize that a curve or even a straight line has an infinite number o

Re: [agi] Re: Real AGI Brain

2020-02-13 Thread James Bowery
Physical embodiment combined with Occam's Razor's foundation of physics implies that a self-improving program may succeed in sufficient self-modeling as to detect anomalous artifacts of is physical grounding which are "outside Turing's box" so to speak. One can reasonably conjecture that such anom

Re: [agi] Re: Real AGI Brain

2020-02-13 Thread James Bowery
Actually, we _know_ that computers have analog _effects_ on their environment in the form of RF noise. So, given the system has adequate knowledge of its environment, and of its own RF effects, it might be able to reach outside Turing's box and thereby escape. On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:44 AM Jam