Again skipping the requirements straight to design. Exactly what problem
are you trying to solve?
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019, 10:07 AM Mike Archbold wrote:
> The abstract is a bit deflating. Why not take out "hobby"? If you're
> this serious I wouldn't call it a hobby maybe just say "early
> stage
The abstract is a bit deflating. Why not take out "hobby"? If you're
this serious I wouldn't call it a hobby maybe just say "early
stages... embryonic... first milestone" etc. Mike A
On 11/9/19, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to submit the draft
> http://staryn
