2009/1/15 Ronald C. Blue ronb...@u2ai.us:
Bayesian surprise attracts human attention http://tinyurl.com/77p9xo
Sounds interesting. In my opinion any research carried out at
universities using public money should be available to the public,
without additional charges.
Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Richard Loosemore r...@lightlink.com wrote:
Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Richard Loosemore r...@lightlink.com
wrote:
The whole point about the paper referenced above is that they are
collecting
(in a large number
Bob Mottram wrote:
2009/1/15 Ronald C. Blue ronb...@u2ai.us:
Bayesian surprise attracts human attention http://tinyurl.com/77p9xo
In my opinion any research carried out at
universities using public money should be available to the public,
without additional charges.
Agreed.
Sounds
You make a very good point BUT human intelligence doesn't come from the 6
billion individuals there are currently living on Earth or from the dead humans
of the past. Most humans don't contribute very much to the collective
knowledge of mankind. The number of contributing humans could be as
http://machineslikeus.com/news/paper-voodoo-correlations-social-neuroscience
http://www.pashler.com/Articles/Vul_etal_2008inpress.pdf
---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed:
