: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:26
AM
Subject: RE: [agi] AI on TV
There was a show on the tube last night on
TechTV. It was part of their weekly Secret, Strange and True
series. They chronicled three guys who are working on creating
advanced AI.
One guy was from
Title: Message
On Dec. 9 Kevin
said:
"It seems to me that building a strictly "black
box" AGI that only uses text or graphical input\output can have tremendous
implications for our society, even without arms and eyes and ears, etc.
Almost anything can be designed or contemplated within a
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of maitriSent:
Monday, December 09, 2002 11:44 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [agi] AI on TV
Ben,
I just read the Bio. You gave alot more
play to his ideas than the show did. You probably know this, but Starlab
has
maitri wrote:
The second guy was from either England or the states, not sure. He was
working out of his garage with his wife. He was trying to develop robot
AI including vision, speech, hearing and movement.
This one's a bit more difficult, Steve Grand perhaps?
Gary Miller wrote:
On Dec. 9 Kevin said:
It seems to me that building a strictly black box AGI that only uses
text or graphical input\output can have tremendous implications for our
society, even without arms and eyes and ears, etc. Almost anything can
be designed or contemplated within a
that's him...
- Original Message -
From: Shane Legg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] AI on TV
maitri wrote:
The second guy was from either England or the states, not sure. He was
working out of his garage
PM
Subject: Re: [agi] AI on TV
Gary Miller wrote:
On Dec. 9 Kevin said:
It seems to me that building a strictly black box AGI that only uses
text or graphical input\output can have tremendous implications for our
society, even without arms and eyes and ears, etc. Almost anything can
be textual.
Of course, sensorimotor experience is richer, but it is not fundamentally
different from textual experience.
Pei
- Original Message -
From: maitri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] AI on TV
I don't want to underestimate
Ben Goertzel wrote:
This is not a matter of principle, it's a matter of pragmatics I
think that a perceptual-motor domain in which a variety of cognitively
simple patterns are simply expressed, will make world-grounded early
language learning much easier...
If anyone has the software
I think my position is similar to Ben's; it's not really what you
ground things in, but rather that you don't expose your limited
little computer brain to an environment that is too complex --
at least not to start with. Language, even reasonably simple
context free languages, could well be too
: Monday, December 09, 2002 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] AI on TV
I think my position is similar to Ben's; it's not really what you
ground things in, but rather that you don't expose your limited
little computer brain to an environment that is too complex --
at least not to start with. Language
11 matches
Mail list logo
