Gary Miller wrote:
That being said other than Cyc I am at a loss to name any serious AI
efforts which are over a few years in duration and have more that 5 man
years worth of effort (not counting promotional and fundraising).
No offense, but I suspect you need to read more of the
:57 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] Early Apps.
Gary Miller wrote:
That being said other than Cyc I am at a loss to name any serious AI
efforts which are over a few years in duration and have more that 5
man
years worth of effort (not counting promotional and fundraising).
No offense, but I
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] Early Apps.
Gary Miller wrote:
That being said other than Cyc I am at a loss to name any serious
AI
efforts which are over a few years in duration and have more that
5
man
years worth of effort
Gary Miller wrote:
I agree that as humans we bring a lot of general knowledge with us when
we learn a new domain. That is why I started off with the general
conversational domain and am now branching into science, philosophy,
mathematics and history. And of course the AI can not make all
Gary Miller wrote:
***
I guess I'm still having trouble with the concept of grounding. If I
teach/encode a
bot with 99% of the knowledge about hydrogen using facts and information
available in
books and on the web. It is now an idiot savant in that it knows all
about hydrogen and
nothing about
Ben Goertzal wrote:
I don't think that a pragmatically-achievable amount of formally-encoded
knowledge is going to be enough to allow a computer system to think
deeply and creatively about any domain -- even a technical domain about
science. What's missing, among other things, is the intricate
Alan Grimes wrote:
According to my rule of thumb,
If it has a natural language database it is wrong,
I more or less agree...
Currently I'm trying to learn Italian before I leave
New Zealand to start my PhD. After a few months working
through books on Italian grammar and trying to learn lots
understanding many of these
ungrammatical utterances.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 11:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [agi] Early Apps.
On 26 Dec 2002 at 10:32, Gary Miller wrote
On Dec. 26 Alan Grimes said:
According to my rule of thumb,
If it has a natural language database it is wrong,
Alan I can see based on the current generation of bot technology why one
would feel this way.
I can also see people having the view that biological systems learn from
scratch so
Neither of these arguments are particularly persuasive though based on
what I've developed to date.
!+ d03$n'7 vv0rk b3cuz $uch 4 $!st3m c4n'+ r34d m! 31337 +3x+.
I am involved in such a project and certainly don't wish to to be
wasting my time!
I would be out of place to say anything
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 01:44:25PM -0800, Alan Grimes wrote:
A human level intelligence requires arbitrary acess to
visual/phonetic/other faculties in order to be intelligent.
I'm sure all those blind and deaf people appreciate being considered
unintelligent.
-xx- Damien X-)
---
To
Damien Sullivan wrote:
A human level intelligence requires arbitrary acess to
visual/phonetic/other faculties in order to be intelligent.
I'm sure all those blind and deaf people appreciate being considered
unintelligent.
It depends.
If their brains are intact they are no less intelligent
Gary Miller wrote:
AG A human level intelligence requires arbitrary access to
AG visual/phonetic/other faculties in order to be intelligent.
By this definition of intelligence then we must conclude the Helen
Keller was totally lacking in
intelligence.
You are confusing the visual faculty (a
On 26 Dec 2002 at 10:32, Gary Miller wrote:
On Dec. 26 Alan Grimes said:
According to my rule of thumb,
If it has a natural language database it is wrong,
Alan I can see based on the current generation of bot technology why one
would feel this way.
I can also see people having
14 matches
Mail list logo
