Experimental procedure for assigning CFJs. You can just tell me
what Court you want to be on. Favoring still works of course.
Comments welcome.
Night Court [Assigned quick turnaround cases (either trivial or game-urgent),
generally
promises to judge in 4 days].
G
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 12:35 PM, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
>
> I transfer one stamp to Agora.
I cause Agora to transfer this stamp to me.
I pay Agora 1 sh. to CFJ on the statement “I caused Agora to transfer this
stamp to me in this message.”
I think rule 2166 (“Assets”) has a clarity problem
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:44 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> Pre-emptive send, thanks enter button.
>
> I initiate the elections for and associated agoran decisions for the
> determination of the Assessor and Tailor. The quorum is 2.0, the valid
> options are PRESENT and the players, the system is instant
[Okay. I think I've got it as I want. I'm going to pend it now, and this
time for real.]
I retract the proposal "Cheer Up v6?" and create and pend the following
proposal in its place:
[In case Gmail decides to be stupid again and do weird things with it
because of my copy-pasting, here it is in pl
I vote for Assessor: {myself, G.}.
I vote for Tailor {Alexis, myself}.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:44 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> Pre-emptive send, thanks enter button.
>
> I initiate the elections for and associated agoran decis
I vote as Alexis does. That is to say, I vote Alexis for Taylor and
endorse G. for Assessor.
On 9/27/2017 11:44 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
Pre-emptive send, thanks enter button.
I initiate the elections for and associated agoran decisions for the
determination of the Assessor and Tailor. The quorum is
I endorse G in both elections, unless that causes me to vote for myself, in
which case i vote Present.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:49 AM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 13:44 VJ Rada wrote:
>
>> Pre-emptive send, thanks enter button.
>>
>> I initiate the elections for and associated
[Yay more spam! This time, fixed a typo and the weird text bug.]
Retract the proposal "Cheer Up vIDEK" and create the following proposal in
its place:
Title: "Cheer Up v6?"
Author: ATMunn
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled "Emotions"
{
Emotion is a player switch, tracked by the registrar, wit
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 13:44 VJ Rada wrote:
> Pre-emptive send, thanks enter button.
>
> I initiate the elections for and associated agoran decisions for the
> determination of the Assessor and Tailor. The quorum is 2.0, the valid
> options are PRESENT and the players, the system is instant run-o
Pre-emptive send, thanks enter button.
I initiate the elections for and associated agoran decisions for the
determination of the Assessor and Tailor. The quorum is 2.0, the valid
options are PRESENT and the players, the system is instant run-off,
the vote collector is the ADoP.
On Thu, Sep 28, 20
Ok, VJ this has been probably the worst, dumbest day for you in agora
nomic. Every damn message has been wrong.
--
>From V.J. Rada
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 13:25 VJ Rada wrote:
> If we reach quorum it will honestly be _miraculous_.
>
> I endorse Alexis. If she does not vote, I vote for Alexis.
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:23 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> > Oh let's just get it done now. I inititate an election for Tailor and
> > the
[I really shouldn't be so quick to pend. Hopefully this will be the last
change, but in case it's not, I won't pend this until the end of today.]
I retract the proposal "Cheer Up" (AGAIN) and create the following proposal
in its place:
Title: "Cheer Up vIDEK" [version I Don't Even Know]
Author: AT
If we reach quorum it will honestly be _miraculous_.
I endorse Alexis. If she does not vote, I vote for Alexis.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:23 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Oh let's just get it done now. I inititate an election for Tailor and
> the agoran decision associated with it, the quorum being 8.0,
Oh let's just get it done now. I inititate an election for Tailor and
the agoran decision associated with it, the quorum being 8.0, the
valid options being the players and PRESENT and the voting system
being instant run-off
--
>From V.J. Rada
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 12:20 Kerim Aydin wrote:
> G. wins the Victory Election.
> G. wins the game (of Agora).
>
For whatever reason, this seemed contentious, so I initiate an election for
Tailor. Happy to take it on.
-Alexis
I deregister
-grok
I transfer one stamp to Agora.
-grok
I object to all currently objectable actions.
All actions so objected to are dissatisfied from agora's point of view.
I support all actions that I've objected to in this message (this does not
withdrawal dissatisfaction)
If possible I retract my support for all actions I've supported in this
mes
I appoint G. speaker.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:22 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> CuddleBeam:
>> > I dislike having wins being granted by election like this, because it feels
>> > too easy. I vote present.
>
> So I agree with CuddleBeam's sentiment here -
I cause myself to receive a Welcome Package.
Really now?
I point my finger at VJ for violation of “No Faking.” Sorry, Referee!
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 7:02 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> Sorry yeah, my plan was p much to get people to call CFJs on my
> frivolous win attempt thinking they were safe and then tricking them
> by revealing this was inva
I call a CFJ with ap: With the below resolution of intent, VJ Rada won
the game by apathy.
First: Is the text, with no spaces between apathy and the next
without, sufficient to create many many intents to win by apathy?
Second: Was Gaelan's attempt sufficient? That consists of finding and
replaci
I resolve the fifteenth below intent.
Debate away, folks.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:27 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> This is Cuddlebeam-esque and I'm ashamed of myself. But I
> will now copy and paste "Without objection, I intend to win by
> apathy", until there is thousands of copies of that text, each
On 09/27/17 05:03, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Counterarguments: The ability to assess ia a power and he abused it by doing
> it after a change in the FV, which caused material losses and given the 0-sum
> nature of the current economic system, that was therefore a material gain.
It doesn't.
Also, I use GII to give 20 shinies to Trigon and Alexis.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> I do include a list of people deregistered by Writ of FAGE in the Monthly
> report because it does not say Registrar's report_s_, I interpreted this to
Counterarguments: The ability to assess ia a power and he abused it by doing it
after a change in the FV, which caused material losses and given the 0-sum
nature of the current economic system, that was therefore a material gain.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmai
I forgot Karma. Given G.'s preference, I change my vote for Herald to {G.,
myself}.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 10:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I vote (myself, Publius) for Herald (would like to run Karma).
>
> I vote
I found heaps of CFJs that seem to be never judged. I plan to use
Certiorari to judge them all like a boss. The first one is 3110, I use
Certiorari to assign it to myself.
The statement of the CFJ is this:
I (Pavitra) satisfy the Victory Condition of Being Pavitra, by means
of sending thi
To avoid committing fraud I hereby specify that the document I am
attempting to ratify is inaccurate to the extent that no such agency
exists. Oh, I made a typo in the below ratification as well. I object
to that ratification and intend to, without objection, ratify this:
{{There is an agency with
An agency has been listed for a long time called "G is Overlord of
Dunce". Is is a verb, so that agency is clearly not an agency. The
problem? That agency was used months ago (like...May) to create
another agency, which was used to pend a proposal!
I therefore intend to ratify the following docume
"[This is probably the same thing as {Gaelan, PSS, ENDORSE nichdel}
but there was some confusion there IIRC.]"
My policy is to resolve it that way.
Good point on the quorum. I revoke my vote for Herald.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I do not vote on Herald in an effort
I do not vote on Herald in an effort to keep it under quorum.
I conditionally vote for Assessor as follows: {Gaelan, PSS} followed by {all
players nichdel votes for, in the order in which e votes for them, excluding
Gaelan and PSS}. [This is probably the same thing as {Gaelan, PSS, ENDORSE
nich
33 matches
Mail list logo
