BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7962 (revision)

I vote as follows: > ID Author(s) AI TitlePender Pend fee > --- > 7962* ATMunn 1.0 Medals of Honour Fix ATMunn 1 AP FOR. -o signature.asc Description:

BUS: Re: OFF: [Expedition] Distribution of a Proposal

On Nov 5, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I submit, pend for an AP, and expedite by specially deputiising, per Rule > 2443, for Promotor distribute the following Proposal. This notice thus > initiates the Agoran decision to adopt the Proposal; the valid votes are

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

I vote as follows: > ID Author(s) AI TitlePender Pend fee > --- > 7957* G. 1.0 Random Irony G. OP [1] AGAINST, but I appreciate the cosmic joke.

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

> On Nov 1, 2017, at 9:41 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> o - >> If there is exactly one winning bid, and if that bid includes a blurb​ >> ​describing the region of Dawsbergen, of at least 70 words, I will include​ >> ​that blurb in at least one future Surveyor’s report if it

BUS: Proposal: Rules are repealable now

I create the following and pend it w/ shinies Proposal: Obvious fix Co-author: Alexis AI: 3 Text: In rule 105 (Rule Changes), add the text "repeal a rule" at the front of bullet point 2. -- >From V.J. Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

Accepted. This is now wierd because this means that I must violate a SHALL by not yet resolving the decision. On 11/06/2017 09:06 PM, ATMunn wrote: > You know what, you're right. Rule 2154 states > "A poll CANNOT be resolved until the decisions to adopt all associated > Campaign Proposals are

Re: BUS: A silly prize

I'm bad at poems Really I just do haikus My vote is SUPPORT On 11/6/2017 6:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: As Herald I did wait to see How Silly we could truly be. And now with a few proposals in queue, We find that puns are easier to do. Poems though - are hard to plan! And harder to make sure

Re: BUS: notice of no-honour

Shiny CFJ: G. is eligible for a Medal of Honour. The medal of honour rule says "in the week of an agoran month", players can declare themselves eligible for a Notice. Munn meant first week. Can G. now declare emself eligible? On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:07 PM, ATMunn

Re: BUS: notice of no-honour

I have no idea if this actually worked or not, since the rule is a bit broken. We'll just... pretend it works... On 11/6/2017 6:49 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: I declare myself eligible for a Medal of Honour.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

You know what, you're right. Rule 2154 states "A poll CANNOT be resolved until the decisions to adopt all associated Campaign Proposals are resolved. When resolving the poll, if a given candidate authored one of the associated Campaign Proposals, that proposal is Committed, and it was not

BUS: [Registrar] Monthly Deportations (Was: Re: DIS: Shiny Supply Level Fact (attn Treasuror!))

I intend to deregister without objection, each of Murphy, Quazie, Ienpw III, omd, Bayushi, and ProofTechnique. On 11/06/2017 07:09 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > The new Shiny Supply Level rule mandates an action made in the first > week of an agoran month. Even though there's only one day left, that's >

Re: BUS: A silly prize

I support. On 11/06/2017 06:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > And so I specify intent -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: BUS: A different fear

As do I. On 11/06/2017 05:08 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: > I put myself up as a candidate for Fearmongor. > > On 11/5/2017 8:12 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: >> I pledge that if I do not win the election for Rulekeepor, I will put >> myself up as a candidate for this election. >> >> On 11/5/2017 6:40 PM,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

Yes, at one point Trigon and I were tied for first preference votes, therefore I looked back to third, but that is no longer necessary. On 11/06/2017 05:00 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 16:54 -0500, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: >> I resolve the election for Rulekeepor

BUS: enough foolishness!

I submit the following the proposal, Silly Tweaks, AI-2: -- Amend Rule 1650 (Silliness) by replacing: ii) A rhymed poem no longer than fourteen lines. (No free verse!) with: ii) A poem with a rhyme scheme

Re: BUS: A silly prize

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 18:45 Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > As Herald I did wait to see > How Silly we could truly be. > And now with a few proposals in queue, > We find that puns are easier to do. > Poems though - are hard to plan! > And harder to make sure they scan. > And

Re: BUS: A silly prize

I support. Do not retort. -Aris On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:45 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > As Herald I did wait to see > How Silly we could truly be. > And now with a few proposals in queue, > We find that puns are easier to do. > Poems though - are hard to plan! > And

BUS: notice of no-honour

I declare myself eligible for a Medal of Honour.

BUS: A silly prize

As Herald I did wait to see How Silly we could truly be. And now with a few proposals in queue, We find that puns are easier to do. Poems though - are hard to plan! And harder to make sure they scan. And with all that to implement A brand new rule with fun intent? Is quite a feat! Deserving

Re: BUS: Silly Parties

PF On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:52 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > I call an AP CFJ w/ the statement: "Alexis's proposal 'Backed Out the > Door' is a 'truly hideous pun' under rule 1650." > > Pretty self-explanatory. I think it does include puns, but that doesn't > mean it IS a pun. >

Re: BUS: A different fear

To make it clear, I resign the office of Fearmongor and I do not consent to being made the holder of the office. On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Rule 1006: > > A person CANNOT be made the holder of an > > elected office without eir explicit or reasonably

Re: BUS: A different fear

Rule 1006: > A person CANNOT be made the holder of an > elected office without eir explicit or reasonably implied consent. I do not consent. Of course, I already *am* Fearmongor, so I don't know if this consent would stop me from winning the election if

Re: BUS: A different fear

I put G. up as a candidate for Fearmongor. On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: > I put myself up as a candidate for Fearmongor. > > > On 11/5/2017 8:12 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: > >> I pledge that if I do not win the election for Rulekeepor, I will put

Re: BUS: A different fear

I put myself up as a candidate for Fearmongor. On 11/5/2017 8:12 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: I pledge that if I do not win the election for Rulekeepor, I will put myself up as a candidate for this election. On 11/5/2017 6:40 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: I initiate an election for Fearmongor.

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 16:48 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I resolve the election for Agronomist as electing o in the first round > with 3 ballots with em as a first-preference, out of 6 total, 4 of which > specified a list: > I resolve the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

Pretty sure I've voted, PSS. I've been incorrectly humiliated! I demand recourse! (If I have jot voted, I vote FOR and for myself) On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:47 AM, ATMunn wrote: > This made me laugh. > > On 11/6/2017 10:00 AM, Josh T wrote: > >> Apparently, I just need

BUS: Notice of Honour

The following is a Notice of Honour: I lose 1 karma for causing trouble to Agora by forgetting to state the quorum on my Agoran Decision initiations. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus gains 1 karma for putting up with my mistakes.

BUS: Dumb proposal

I pledge to either pend or withdraw the below proposal before the beginning of the next Agoran week. I submit the following proposal: Title: "But I already live there!" AI: 1 Amend rule 2474 "Green Cards" by replacing the text "the United States" with "Brazil".

BUS: Ribbon

I claim an Orange ribbon for proposal 7943.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

I change my vote on the Rulekeepor election to Alexis. On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Note that my and G.'s votes will change (I changed mine; eir conditional is > different) for rulekeepor > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, 07:58 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

Apparently, I just need to cast a vote to avoid being given a humiliating reminder, so for all pending proposals whose valid options include FOR and AGAINST, I vote PURPLE. I understand this is effectively "PRESENT", but that's not what I'm casting it as in case if there is something silly that I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

Actually, I change my vote on the Referee election to PRESENT. I'm not even sure who I want to be Referee. On 11/6/2017 9:31 AM, ATMunn wrote: My vote for Referee will also change, and Telnaior has voted now. Also, I was going to publish my ADoP report, but I already changed everything to be

Re: BUS: Fine Levying

You can't object to a "with 2 support." I support both intents. On 11/6/2017 2:58 AM, Telnaior wrote: It doesn't really matter, but I object to both of these. On 2017-11-06 18:46, VJ Rada wrote: I intend to levy a fine, with 2 support, on Alexis. E was issued a blue card, with 1 shiny going

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7962 (revision)

I vote FOR (duh) On 11/6/2017 2:38 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: [I don't think I ever actually did this.] I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

There we go :D Is this actually as difficult as people feared? Seemed to me like you'd have a list of who DID vote, so flipping that to who DIDN'T should be easy enough. On that note, I vote FOR VJ Rada's proposal, and vote for VJ Rada in the Referee election. On 2017-11-06 22:41, Publius

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

Oh, I haven't voted? Ok. I vote FOR VJ Rada's proposal. I also change my vote on the Referee election to o. On 11/6/2017 6:41 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: Thank you! I issue a humiliating public reminder to and shame for failure to vote: Aris, Murphy, 天火狐, Quazie, Gaelan, Ienpw

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

Gah lol. OK, I uh, I vote FOR to all things I can vote FOR to. On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you! I issue a humiliating public reminder to and shame for > failure to vote: Aris, Murphy, 天火狐, Quazie, Gaelan,

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

Accepted. I will republish the same this evening. On 11/06/2017 07:51 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 06:24 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > wrote: > > I resolve the decision(s) to adopt

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7962 (revision)

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 02:39 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > ID Author(s) AI TitlePender Pend > fee > --- > 7962* ATMunn 1.0 Medals of Honour Fix

BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 06:24 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7954-7956 below. > CoE: The voting period for these decisions has not ended yet. The first initiation was invalid, and the second initiation

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

Thank you! I issue a humiliating public reminder to and shame for failure to vote: Aris, Murphy, 天火狐, Quazie, Gaelan, Ienpw III, omd, Bayushi, nichdel, Cuddlebeam, ATMunn, ProofTechnique, Trigon, Alexis, and Telnaior. Alexis, VJ Rada, PSS, o, G. On 11/06/2017 06:38 AM, Madeline wrote: > Well the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

How could I make it more humiliating without being rude. On 11/06/2017 05:53 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 05:51 -0500, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: >> I issue a humiliating public reminder for this proposal and extend >> the voting period by 7 days. > ISIDTID. That

BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

I issue a humiliating public reminder for this proposal and extend the voting period by 7 days. On 11/01/2017 09:15 AM, ATMunn wrote: > On 10/31/2017 9:34 PM, VJ Rada wrote: >> Sorry Munn, neither the initiation of the election nor the >> distribution of the proposal worked. Rules say the

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Expedition] Distribution of a Proposal

I give 2 shinies to Agora and 1 shiny to VJ Rada, in appreciation of rules and enforcement that make my job easier. On 11/06/2017 02:45 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > I issue Alexis a blue card for failing to state quorum. Obviously I > will issue em the same card I issed ATMunn. The fine is 2 shinies, one

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7962 (revision)

I vote FOR. On 11/06/2017 02:44 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > FOR on 7962. > > At this rate, it'll only be a couple of months and we'll get to 8000! > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Aris Merchant > > wrote: > > [I

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Expedition] Distribution of a Proposal

I vote FOR. On 11/05/2017 10:11 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 22:10 Alexis Hunt > wrote: > > I submit, pend for an AP, and expedite by specially deputiising, > per Rule 2443, for Promotor distribute the following Proposal. >

Re: BUS: Proposal: Silly Person & Poetry Repeal

Poetry Submission: Roses are red Violets are blue I should win this Agoran Decision Unlike you On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:18 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > who even gets those shinies? agora? > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > >> I

Re: BUS: Proposal: Silly Person & Poetry Repeal

I challenge VJ Rada to a POETRY DUEL and pay 10 shinies to this purpose. Cuddlebeam is the coolest, and agile like a tortoise *drops mic* *crowd goes wild* On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:17 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > This week I continue with my apparently weekly goal of repealing

BUS: Proposal: Silly Person & Poetry Repeal

This week I continue with my apparently weekly goal of repealing things. I submit and pend the following (w/ AP) Title: Rhyming sux tbh AI: 1 Text: Repeal rule 1650, "Silliness" Repeal the rule called "Poetry Duel Challenge Writ" ​ -- >From V.J. Rada