BUS: Re: BAK: well, while we're at it

On 2018-02-04 12:33, Alexis wrote: I intend, without objection, to declare Apathy, specifying {ais523, Alexis, Aris, G., Corona, Murphy, V.J. Rada, ATMunn}. (i.e. the set of people I suspect are actually reading the backup list.) -Alexis I object to this intent.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Picto-Nomic

Gotcha. Anyways, I do that then: I create the following proposal with the name "Picto-Nomic" and pend it by paying 3 shinies to Agora: Create a new rule called "Picto-Nomic" (Power=1.0) with the following text: Rules may have their content be, instead of text, images, or urls to them, with

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Picto-Nomic

My intent was for legitimate images, like .pngs And yes, I retract the proposal. On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 6:14 AM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed, and we don't need a new rule for ascii art (it has been ruled to be > valid "text"). Care to retract this so I

BUS: Picto-Nomic

Seeing how we're entering a new design era with the mass repeals, I'll suggest some new things (hopefully they haven't been done before already): I create the following proposal with the name "Picto-Nomic" and pend it with 1 AP: Create a new rule called "Picto-Nomic" (Power=1.0) with the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: boo!

I object. -Aris On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 5:19 PM ATMunn wrote: > I intend for me and CB to win by apathy without objection. > > That probably doesn't work, but I haven't read the ruleset in ages so I > have no idea. > > On 2/3/2018 7:19 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: boo!

I object. On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 at 20:19 ATMunn wrote: > I intend for me and CB to win by apathy without objection. > > That probably doesn't work, but I haven't read the ruleset in ages so I > have no idea. > > On 2/3/2018 7:19 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > I object to all

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: boo!

I intend for me and CB to win by apathy without objection. That probably doesn't work, but I haven't read the ruleset in ages so I have no idea. On 2/3/2018 7:19 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: I object to all current apathy victory attempts which don't include me as victors in them :D On Sat, Feb

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8005-8007

I was thinking about a mass repeal of the old stuff but I'm glad to hear that it's all already being dealt with. I vote FOR to all too. On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Corona wrote: > I vote FOR all.​ > > On 00:37, Jan 29, 2018, at 00:37, Aris Merchant

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: boo!

I object to all current apathy victory attempts which don't include me as victors in them :D On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 3:09 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > Not that I’m aware of (the support went to DIS anyway). > > > On Feb 2, 2018, at 5:58 PM, Ørjan Johansen

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8005-8007

I vote FOR all.​ On 00:37, Jan 29, 2018, at 00:37, Aris Merchant wrote: >I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran >Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal >pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the