No ruling on the merits yet, but a word of warning: I read this as
requiring a separate expression of praise for *each* god. A one sentence
“praise to all of these gods” thing would not be judged sufficient. The
gods are unlikely to mind if the message of praise for each god takes on a
I earn 5 coins for this report.
--
Jason Cobb
On 8/4/19 12:52 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
To the official forum (not that people care enough that it should be
at the official forum):
On 8/4/19 12:51 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
This is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
---List of
This is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
---List of Sectors---
Sector 1: Andromeda Galaxy
Sector 2: Milky Way Galaxy
Sector 3: Triangulum Galaxy
Sector 4: Bode's Galaxy
Sector 5: Antennae Galaxies
Sector 6: Black Eye Galaxy
Sector 7: Butterfly Galaxies
Sector 8: Cartwheel Galaxy
I submit myself to the Agoran Gods!
I create the following Fantasy Rule: {
The final paragraph of each contest message shall contain a message of
praise to each Agoran God mentioned previously in a contest message, plus
one not mentioned previously.
}
I apologise for my formatting. I declare
I submit myself to the Agoran Gods! I join the FRC and create the following
rule
O Hark, the commandments of the LORD are upon us! The LORD demanding the
respect he deserves, the LORD hereby decrees that all references to Agoran
Gods shall refer to em in ALL CAPITALS.
Praise the LORD
--
>From
On 7/30/19 11:31 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
Having given intent, and having received 2 support, I initiate an
election for Astronomor, also becoming a candidate.
Jason Cobb
The nomination period of the election has ended. To the best of my
knowledge, I am the only candidate.
This is an
[I'm not sure exactly how good this is, but a slight restriction on
joining seems like a non-awful place to start]
I hereby become a constant, submitting the following Fantasy Rule
("Entry into the Church"):
I submit myself to the Agoran Gods!
As directed by Eir Supreme Eminence, The
On 8/3/19 10:49 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 9, the voting method is AI-majority, and the
I CFJ: "When the action of ratification of a public document is
performed, Rule 1551 is the agent that performs certain changes to the
gamestate."
Evidence:
{
Excerpt from Rule 1551 ("Ratification"):
A public document is part (possibly all) of a public message.
When a public document is
On 8/3/19 3:39 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I remain unconvinced by D. Margaux's further arguments, so I assign
the following judgement to CFJ 3765 (tweaked slightly from draft).
Judgement in CFJ 3765:
I claim a reward of 5 coins for this judgement.
Jason Cobb
I CFJ: "A party to the contract in evidence CAN act on behalf of the
other party to transfer a coin.'
Evidence:
{
Contract:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-August/041185.html
Consent of a second party:
[I did the below too early, perhaps].
I intend to flip Telnaior's master switch to Agora, with Notice.
On 7/23/2019 7:36 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I intend to flip Telnaior's master switch to Agora, with Notice.
> === CFJ 3761 ===
>
>A party to the contract in evidence CAN create a gift by some
>method.
>
> ==
I deliver the following judgement for CFJ 3761:
Sure I'll bite (but I'll leave the judging to someone else).
I consent to the below contract.
On 8/3/2019 1:47 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
On 8/3/19 4:13 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Yeah, when I set this up with you I thought it would be a long discussion
about whether contract precedence should be
On 8/3/19 4:13 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Yeah, when I set this up with you I thought it would be a long discussion
about whether contract precedence should be forwards or backwards or
whether
there were other general interpretation principles that could apply
(with a
good chance of a "nope -
I remain unconvinced by D. Margaux's further arguments, so I assign the
following judgement to CFJ 3765 (tweaked slightly from draft).
Judgement in CFJ 3765:
I will begin by reading into the record this message from G. ([0]):
A little gratuitous for CFJ 3765-3766:
It's likely that an
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:14 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> The below CFJ is 3764. I assign it to D. Margaux.
>
> === CFJ 3764 ===
>
>If a proposal purporting to register nch was adopted now, then one
>second later, e would be
=== CFJ 3762 ===
The investigator of the Finger-pointing done in this message CAN
impose a fine on Jason Cobb for the Crime of Oathbreaking for the
pledge in evidence.
On 8/3/19 12:11 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I assign the following judgement to CFJ 3766.
Judgement in CFJ 3766:
I earn 5 coins for this judgement.
I award myself a Blue Ribbon for this judgement.
Jason Cobb
I assign the following judgement to CFJ 3766.
Judgement in CFJ 3766:
As best I can determine, this is the original text of Rule 1698 [0]:
It must always be possible to adopt Proposals within a 4 week
period. Any change to the game state which would result in
this condition
I'm not sure I agree with you or not, but if ratification is non-obvious
as a solution then it deserves more in-depth in the judgement, at least.
I self-file a motion to reconsider CFJ 3761.
On 8/2/2019 6:03 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
On 8/2/19 8:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I intend, with notice, to flip Hālian's master switch to Agora.
Having given notice, I flip Hālian's master switch to Agora.
--
- Falsifian
22 matches
Mail list logo
