I wrote:
Oh, good catch. I intend (with Agoran consent of Collectors) to amend
this contract to read, in full:
Administrivia:
1) The name of this contract is Card Collective Contract, Agoran
(abbr. CCCA).
2) Any player CAN join or leave CCCA by announcement. Members of CCCA
I vote as follows. As usual, in case of ambiguity, proposal titles are
most important in determining my intent.
8459* Jason, [1] 3.0 Talismans
FOR
8460* G., ais523 3.0 UV-G Sunblock
FOR
8461l R. Lee, Aris 2.0 Redoing Adopted Proposals
FOR
84
On 7/2/2020 11:41 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>> So where this sort of thing got judged or entered custom to count for our
>> version of "clear" is still a mystery. So at this point, I'm honestly
>> happy if the judge just mentions "this sort of thing worked before, but
>> the precede
On 7/2/2020 11:05 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> Thank you for the input. I will definitely take a closer look at those
> previous cases and incorporate them into my judgement. It's my bad for
> not at least briefly looking for previous precedents. If someone finds
> that other succe
I, nch, cast a**ballot (syn. vote) which I believe to be valid on each
of the following proposals wherein the vote directly below the quote
with the proposal number is the vote on that proposal.
On 6/30/20 1:54 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
> 8459* Jason, [1] 3.0 T
On 7/1/20 11:24 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:00 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>> CoE: This resolution is invalid because the decision was already resolved
>>> the previous time, because G.’s vote was invalid, because it did not
>>> “clearly set[] fo
On 7/2/20 12:43 AM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> at 7:26 AM, Becca Lee via agora-business
> wrote:
>
>> {Acting on behalf of nch, I resolve one of eir intents to deregister R.
>> Lee. I register. I award myself a welcome package. I transfer a victory
>> card and a justice card to nch.}
>>
>> I
