On 03/30/2013 10:55 PM, woggle wrote:
For each of the following players, I intend, without objection, to make em
inactive:
Pavitra
I go on hold.
7333 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Oh, for Pete's sake
FOR
7334 3.0 Ordinary woggle Precedence of unnumbered rules
FOR
7335 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Golem stripping
AGAINST
7336 2.0 Ordinary woggle Down with Rubles
FOR
As each Slave Golem is an entity with zero Props, and zero is less than
nine, each Slave Golem is a Marine under the last sentence of R2376.
For each person other than myself (hereafter $PERSON), I do the following:
{
I create 4*N Slave Golems in my possession named Soldier-$PERSON-1
through
7328 1.0 Ordinary Murphy Bookbinding
AGAINST
7329 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli The Card That Owned Itself
AGAINST
7330 1.0 Ordinary Pavitra Oops
FOR
7331 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Let's bookbind differently
FOR
7332 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Lesser oops
FOR
Renaissance Reenactment
FOR
7327 2.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Deposition
AGAINST
Pavitra
7319 1.0 Ordinary G. Trading Cards
FOR
7320 1.0 Ordinary scshunt Lexicon
FOR
7321 2.0 Ordinary Murphy Appeal of appeals
FOR
On 11/05/2012 09:02 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, Pavitra wrote:
On 11/04/2012 11:42 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
CFJ I own an ais523 card providing i did this all correct this time
CFJ: Max Schutz initiated a CFJ in the above-quoted message.
Arguments: Given eir stated
On 11/04/2012 11:42 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
CFJ I own an ais523 card providing i did this all correct this time
CFJ: Max Schutz initiated a CFJ in the above-quoted message.
Arguments: Given eir stated and demonstrated difficulties with
understanding the rules, it may be unreasonable to expect em
7315 1.5 Ordinary omd Power of the Herald
FOR
7316 3.0 Ordinary omd Democratic People's Republic
AGAINST; vulnerable to invasion
7317 2.0 Ordinary omd Make quorum manipulation harder for
PRESENT
7318 3.0 Ordinary FKA441344 Agoran Decision fixes
On 09/27/2012 07:50 PM, omd wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
I intend, with notice, to cause the following Rule Changes:
I intend, with 3 Elder support, to declare a Gerontocracy. I object
to both this intent and the generalized
On 09/19/2012 08:03 AM, FKA441344 wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to determine the new Air Traffic
Controller. For this
decision, the eligible voters are the active first-class players, the vote
collector is the IADoP, and the valid options are FKA441344 and
scshunt (PRESENT is
This message does not contain any typos.
On 09/19/2012 12:03 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
7309 3.0 Ordinary scshunt Conditional Destruction
FOR
7310 1.0 Plutocratic scshunt Richard Potato Boat
I spend a ruble to increase my voting limit on this decision. AGAINT.
7311 2.0 Ordinary
Power On
PRESENT
7297 3.0 scshunt Slow Down
FOR
7298 2.0 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
7299 1.5 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
Pavitra
I transfer a prop from ais523 (because e has the most) to Eileen
(because props are created faster when entities other than first-class
players have some).
On 08/29/2012 02:38 PM, Pavitra wrote:
7284 3.0 FKA441344 No Zero Length Reports
FOR unless P7268 is going to pass, in which case AGAINST.
I retract this and re-vote: FOR unless P7286 is going to pass, in which
case AGAINST.
I vote for G. for Justiciar.
I support the intent to flip Deepnomic to Friendly.
7281 1.0 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
7282 1.0 FKA441344 (none)
AGAINST
7283 1.0 FKA441344 (none)
AGAINST
Pavitra
7270 1.0 scshunt No Klein Turtles
PRESENT
7271 1.0 G. No Klein Unicorns
FOR
7272 2.0 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
7273 1.0 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
7274 3.0 FKA441344 Voting Chambers
PRESENT
7275 2.0 FKA441344 Gerontocratic Chamber
FOR
7276 2.0 FKA441344 Plutocratic Chamber
FOR
I transfer a ruble to the President's Speaker Account.
On 07/15/2012 08:22 PM, FKA441344 wrote:
7267 1 G. Still Crazy after all these Years
FOR
7268 3 G. allow secret votes
FOR
7269 2 FKA441344 not funny anymore
FOR if at most half of the unconditional non-PRESENT votes on this are
FOR, or otherwise PRESENT
On 07/12/2012 08:04 PM, WoodsPam wrote:
I am now a player.
Does that work?
CFJ: WoodsPam called a CFJ in the quoted message.
On 07/12/2012 07:09 PM, FKA441344 wrote:
72652 ais523 Criminal quanitifiers
FOR
7266 1.7 omd make MALFORMED meaningful
FOR
On 07/08/2012 06:17 PM, FKA441344 wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to determine the new Promotor.
For this decision, the eligible voters are the active first-class
players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the valid options are
FKA441344 and scshunt (PRESENT is also a valid
On 06/29/2012 05:36 PM, omd wrote:
7251 1 Tanner L. Swett Reduction
AGAINST. I don't get it.
7252 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX
AGAINST
7253 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX Mk II
FOR
7254 3 441344, etc. DEFENSE FIX Mk III
PRESENT
7255 2 441344 ANTI-SIEGE Mk II
FOR
I transfer a ruble to Ozymandias's Speaker account.
On 06/25/2012 03:24 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Noé Rubinstein wrote:
The game is slow enough nowadays for me not to mind giving it a go; I
would hate for my first time to be unambiguous, though, so here I go.
Also, the usual CFJ.
CFJ, disqualifying Phlogistique: Phlogistique registered in the
On 06/24/2012 07:01 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
For each player, I intend, without objection, to deregister em.
Among the above-quoted intents, I object to those corresponding to
myself and Eileen.
On 06/18/2012 09:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I intend, with Agoran consent, to flip the Speed to Normal.
I support.
On 06/08/2012 07:03 PM, John Smith wrote:
For good measure, I transfer Scapegoat to Pavitra.
I transfer Scapegoat to the number four hundred forty-one thousand three
hundred forty-four.
On 06/08/2012 11:09 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
Arguments: I sent this message to a-d.
I sent this message to a-d.
I create a Slave Golem named Eileen. I transfer my rubles to Eileen.
On 05/29/2012 11:50 AM, omd wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/28/2012 09:29 PM, omd wrote:
7246 3 omd Adoption reassociation
AGAINST
Why?
Because it looks like a trivial rewording to no effect, which makes me
suspect
are not worth the ambiguity, and
.. another
AGAINST, yes they are
7249 3 omd Just because it's weird doesn't mean it
.. wasn't necessary
PRESENT
7250 3 omd And two
FOR
Pavitra
Phoenix Wright Defense Testimony
FOR
7228 2 Murphy No news is slow news
FOR
7229 2 Murphy Bully pulpit
AGAINST; this would make the Speaker criminally liable for failure to
gather Agoran Consent
Pavitra
On 05/04/2012 03:22 PM, FKA441344 wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to determine the new Assessor. For this
decision, the eligible voters are the active first-class players, the vote
collector is the IADoP, and the valid options are Murphy and omd (PRESENT is
also a valid vote).
I
of invalidating non-AGAINST votes on
Rubberstamped decisions
Pavitra
== CFJ 3135 ==
In the quoted message, Murphy assigned a judge to a CFJ.
I accept the caller's arguments and G.'s gratuitous arguments. FALSE.
I lie down.
TTttPF
On 02/08/2012 05:25 PM, Pavitra wrote:
7164 2 Murphy, etc. Grumpy Old Men
FOR
7166 3 omd, etc. We've all been ignoring this
AGAINST
7167 2 441344fixing another problem with WotE
Risky, but the ruleset doesn't *currently* have any cases of without
[number
On 02/05/2012 03:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
= Criminal Case 3152 =
Murphy failed to publish the IADoP's report, the Assessor's
report, and the Registrar's report during the week Mon. 16 -
Sun. 22, violating Rule 2143 and
On 01/30/2012 09:12 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
With Agoran Consent, I intend to register the OmNom Constitution.
(I intend to, later on, have the ONC state, I support and do so,
then call a CFJ on its playerhood.)
On 01/29/2012 09:15 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
With Agoran Consent, I intend to register the OmNom Constitution.
FOR
The text of the OmNom Constitution follows this horizontal rule.
CoE: No part of the following text is a Rule.
Herald
Candidates:
*G.
*441344
G.
IADoP
Candidates:
*Murphy
*441344
441344
Registrar
Candidates:
*Murphy
*Yally
*441344
Yally
== CFJ 3148 ==
Initiating a CFJ on one's own playerhood does not reasonably
unambiguously indicate intent to become a player
Per CFJ 3130, TRUE.
On 01/24/2012 03:16 PM, Pavitra wrote:
On 01/24/2012 02:37 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Judgement of CFJ 3143:
It /might/; see CFJs 2979 and (especially) 3129. TRUE.
However, I don't think that CFJing on I am a player generally
indicates intent to register, even if the caller was unambiguously
On 01/24/2012 02:37 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Judgement of CFJ 3143:
It /might/; see CFJs 2979 and (especially) 3129. TRUE.
However, I don't think that CFJing on I am a player generally
indicates intent to register, even if the caller was unambiguously
unregistered before the CFJ. Thus,
7154 2 441344 fix to 1023
FOR
7155 3 441344 The Person Agora, The Misguiding Therof, And
Eir Security
AGAINST
7156 3 441344 Clarify/Explicate Agoran Consent
AGAINST
7157 2 441344 Clarify/Explicate Elder
...but it's increasingly clear I'm not really in a position to keep this
up. I resign Horton.
CFJ 2875 worked, and rot13ed English is certainly clearer than Caesared
Latin. This case therefore depends directly on CFJ 3143.
I create the following promise and transfer it to the Tree: {
Title: 3146 DEPENDS 3143
Cashing: CFJ 3143 has been judged.
Text:
I assign to CFJ 3146 the same
On 01/14/2012 08:31 PM, omd wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:29 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
* or commonly referred to as /yy
The second is impossible in the current ruleset; the third isn't, as
although no rule is currently commonly referred to with a name of that
On 01/13/2012 02:07 PM, 441344 wrote:
I declare intent to, with Agoran Consent, cause the President to taunt
the police specifying 6.
I support.
On 01/11/2012 10:09 PM, Pavitra wrote:
Horton's Promise Report
Recent activity:
[All times are UTC.]
Dec 19 06:34: (report published)
Dec 27 21:51: [*] Horton destroys each I want blood!
Dec 27 21:51: [*] Horton destroys each Vote Issue Series G1
Dec 27 21:51: [*] Horton destroys each G1
FOR
7149 1 G. contest fix
FOR
7150 3 Murphy Whose fault is it, anyway?
FOR
7151 3 Murphy This is not a footnote
FOR
7152 1.7 Murphy Agora in the the winter
FOR
7153 1 Flameshadowxeroshin No deben bailar
AGAINST
Pavitra
On 01/10/2012 10:25 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I initiate an election for Ambassador, nominating ais523, omd, and
Pavitra. (All are non-idle players of BlogNomic; I believe the only
others are scshunt [who recently resigned] and me [I don't want it].)
I decline.
On 12/30/2011 08:37 PM, omd wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Horton's Promise Report
Criminal case: Pavitra violated Rule 2143 (Official Reports and
Duties) by publishing information stating that the report is about
elephants, trees
Having received no objections, I do so.
On 12/20/2011 04:23 PM, Pavitra wrote:
For each Promise quoted below, I intend without objection to destroy
that Promise.
--
Quantity: 2
Title: I want blood!
Author: scshunt
of the attempted resolution,
rather than forward from the time of initiation.
On 12/27/2011 04:51 PM, Pavitra wrote:
Having received no objections, I do so.
On 12/20/2011 04:23 PM, Pavitra wrote:
For each Promise quoted below, I intend without objection to destroy
that Promise
For each Promise quoted below, I intend without objection to destroy
that Promise.
--
Quantity: 2
Title: I want blood!
Author: scshunt
Owner: Tree
Cashing:
A proposal has been adopted which imposes a penalty or
== CFJ 3136 ==
If and when the Victory Announcement in the same message that
created this CFJ self-ratifies, if the rules regarding victory
have not changed since, then ais523 will Win the Game.
On 12/07/2011 08:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3129
== CFJ 3129 ==
Do or did I register. ?
I
== CFJ 3129 ==
Do or did I register. ?
First, the caller's stated intention that the newlines be a vital part
of the statement is wholly irrelevant, as
On 12/06/2011 08:30 PM, omd wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Mister Snuggles mr.snu...@gmail.com wrote:
i support this proposal wholeheartedly.
If I am Mister Snuggles, I intend, with Agoran Consent, to deregister.
I object.
On 11/28/2011 07:20 PM, omd wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I intend (with 2 support) to request reconsideration. Especially in
light of CFJ 3126, X committed crime Y defined by rule Z clearly
(albeit implicitly) implies X thereby violated rule
quoted in evidence.
Evidence: the above-quoted message.
I disfavor this case.
Pavitra
Transactional Memory
FOR
7143 3.0 tswett Powered up STM
AGAINST. I'd rather see it in action for a while before giving it enough
power to mess up core rules.
Pavitra
On 11/06/2011 03:52 PM, Pavitra wrote:
I create a Promise with the following text, and then cash it: {{I cash
this Promise. This Promise is not destroyed by being cashed.}}
I create and cash a Promise with the following text: {{ If I am
supine, I sit. Otherwise I become supine. I then cash
to AGAINST.
Pavitra
On 11/10/2011 10:37 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
== CFJ 3123 ==
I exist.
TRUE.
condition for not being destroyed upon cashing: {{I
am a player of Agora.}}
TTttPF, I intend without objection to destroy each of the above-quoted
Promises.
Pavitra
On 10/25/2011 12:25 PM, Pavitra wrote:
I intend, without objection, to destroy each of the following Promises:
(2011-10-23 G.)[has served its purpose]
Having received no objections, if this Promise exists, I destroy it.
War Bonds [CFJ: Attn: CotC failed]
Having received
On 10/31/2011 03:53 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
7135 1.7 G. Fixing Victory v2.02
FOR
Pavitra
On 10/31/2011 05:11 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
As IADoP, I initiate a decision for Rulekeepor. Candidates are
Arkady English and omd. Vote collector is the IADoP.
OMD
On 10/26/2011 01:52 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 14:39, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
SPELUNKING THE RULES CONTEST
After some perusal of the July/August archives, I am not finding
anything qualifying as a delve; therefore I'm declaring a lost
expedition.
I
On 10/26/2011 03:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
So I do. And good. Compared to the test script I ran and didn't mail, the
Delve 4 picks kinda sucked (can't pick until previous round resolved so
the pick was ineffective).
Aww, I was totally going to get all three at once.
I announce my intent
I intend, without objection, to destroy each of the following Promises:
(2011-10-23 G.)[has served its purpose]
War Bonds [CFJ: Attn: CotC failed]
(2011-07-13 G. 2) [G. is back]
(2011-04-25 ehird) [has served its purpose]
Horton Pavitra
might work if the office of Herald is vacant, so that
no player is required to fulfill the office's duties.
I assume Herald. I resign Herald.
I publish the following document, Victory Condition of Being Pavitra:
{{
The entity in question has sent a message to a public forum from the
email address
FOR
7129 1.0 scshunt Why did we repeal that victory condition?
PRESENT
7130 1.0 Arkady
AGAINST because commitment is misspelled.
7131 2.0 Murphy Points are pointless unless scorekept
FOR
7132 1.0 Pavitra SHALL Promises
FOR
7133 1.0 omd Rule by Consent
FOR
7134 2.0 ais523
On 10/21/2011 04:45 PM, Pavitra wrote:
On 10/20/2011 08:48 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Promotor:
* Voting hereby begins
- Candidates are scshunt and Wooble (Arkady English's attempted
attempted acceptance was NttPF)
- Each active first-class player has one vote
* Office
On 10/23/2011 06:04 PM, John Smith wrote:
I suggest that a Player file a Motion to Reconsider CfJ 3109. Among
other objections, the judgment is inconsistent with the judge's
arguments. All information necessary to render a judgment of TRUE or
FALSE is public, and the statement makes precise
On 10/23/2011 06:42 PM, Pavitra wrote:
On 10/23/2011 06:04 PM, John Smith wrote:
I suggest that a Player file a Motion to Reconsider CfJ 3109. Among
other objections, the judgment is inconsistent with the judge's
arguments. All information necessary to render a judgment of TRUE or
FALSE
Based on Arkady's apparent lack of interest in being the Rulekeepor (e
hasn't published any reports), I intend, with 4 support, to initiate
an election for Rulekeepor.
I support.
I support.
On 10/23/2011 08:03 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
== CFJ 3115 ==
It would be ILLEGAL for me to cash the above-quoted promise.
R2143:
While performing weekly
On 10/20/2011 08:48 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Promotor:
* Voting hereby begins
- Candidates are scshunt and Wooble (Arkady English's attempted
attempted acceptance was NttPF)
- Each active first-class player has one vote
* Office remains held by Arkady English until
action seems wrong; actions whose
prerequisites are unmet generally fail.
The interpretation of the registration rule is inherently subjective,
but I feel that all of these considerations together add up to a serious
doubt about AmarChandra Ganna's intent to register. FALSE.
Pavitra
On 10/19/2011 02:51 PM, Mister Snuggles wrote:
there is no first-class player i claim not to be.
I doubt each such claim of identity.
Pavitra
enacted.
This promise is destroyed upon cashing if and only if it has been cashed
at least one week previously.
Text: I transfer 10 points to the casher.
}
Pavitra
[The size of the award reflects how many points I think I have, and how
many players there currently are. I invite others to contribute
On 10/17/2011 11:07 PM, woggle wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
I intend, without objection, to set the Speed to Slow.
[I will resolve at most one of the above intents.]
- woggle
I support.
On 09/28/2011 06:59 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
For each player other than me, I intend, without objection, to make
that player inactive.
I object to my own inactivation.
Pavitra
.
In view of the fact that scshunt paid a 13-point fine when only 4 or 8
were required (two fines of 4 points), I judge CFJs 3072-3 GUILTY/DISCHARGE.
Pavitra
, pistachio}.
Pavitra
a single act.
Thus, judgement has already been reached in another criminal case (CFJ
3091) with the same Accused, the same rule, and substantially the same
alleged act. I judge CFJs 3092-3095 NOT GUILTY.
Pavitra
I nominate Taral for Rulekeepor.
On 08/15/2011 04:22 PM, Pavitra wrote:
I intend, without objection, to destroy the below-quoted promise.
Title: (2011-08-08 woggle)
Author: woggle
Owner: Tree
Conditions:
omd has transferred 30 points to the lost and found department and not
used these points to satisfy any fine or other
costs
FOR
Pavitra
On 08/18/2011 10:11 AM, Sabrina Friedman wrote:
If I have not already done so, I hereby publish the below-quoted message.
On 07/05/2011 06:45 PM, Pavitra wrote:
For each of the Promises listed below, I intend without objection to
destroy that Promise:
* the untitled Promise created
On 08/11/2011 11:19 AM, Pavitra wrote:
On 08/11/2011 08:55 AM, Arkady English wrote:
Given that the promise, as written, seems not to work (or does it?) -
it certainly doesn't do what it was supposed to, and has a typo in it
which renders it malformed.
Would it be an idea for the Horton
it to the casher: { Text: I retract
all my votes on the specified proposal and vote as specified on it. }
I cash this promise.
Pavitra
3058; or the time limit for judging CFJ 3080 has
expired.
Text:
If the time limit for judging CFJ 3080 has not expired (and it has not
already been judged), I judge CFJ 3080 GUILTY - DISCHARGE.
(CFJ 3080 has been judged.)
Horton Pavitra
== CFJ 3070 ==
The president has been deregistered
Caller's Arguments:
Rule 2326/2 states The President is a second-class person. Causing the
FOR
7116 3 woggle? Protect Assets
FOR
7117 1 omd General costs 2.0
FOR
7118 2 scshunt that was dump
FOR
Pavitra
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
