I COE on this report - I am speaker by ratification.
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 5:02 PM VJ Rada wrote:
> I am confident this is correct, and have fixed the dumbest mistakes I
> have been making.
>
> =Metareport=
> This report is effective as of the time of its publishing
I object.
I suggest we fix the rule, or revoke the rule
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 13:19 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > The Objective of this Proposal Competition is to make the most
> malevolent,
> > heinous and EVIL proposal that
I endorse G in both elections, unless that causes me to vote for myself, in
which case i vote Present.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:49 AM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 13:44 VJ Rada wrote:
>
>> Pre-emptive send, thanks enter button.
>>
>> I
I object to all currently objectable actions.
All actions so objected to are dissatisfied from agora's point of view.
I support all actions that I've objected to in this message (this does not
withdrawal dissatisfaction)
If possible I retract my support for all actions I've supported in this
Insert 1 Shiny into the recently registered ATM.
I give ATM a trust token.
Correction: 24 hours having passed, I revoke QAZ.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:27 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 24 hours having passed, QAZ has been revoked. Now that this is done,
> explain what could've been done to stop this?
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:1
24 hours having passed, QAZ has been revoked. Now that this is done,
explain what could've been done to stop this?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:18 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend to revoke QAZ in 24 hours.
>
I intend to revoke QAZ in 24 hours.
I vote [Quazie, ais523, Peter Suber, Steve Jobs]
I change my vote to (if valid to do so): [Agora, cats, comex, omd, a Live
Walrus, Quazie, ais523, Peter Suber, Steve Jobs]
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:18 PM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I dislike having wins being granted by
You can't revoke pledges
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 18:44 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I intend to revoke the below pledge with 4 days notice. It was made while
> I was a non-player and CFJs were free for me.
>
> (if I do this, the proposal will now make me party to an
In all elections opened in the quoted message I vote [Present]
In all elections opened in the quoted message I vote :
{
[
The Incumbent, unless the Incumbent is VJ Rada,
Whoever first votes for emself, unless that player is VJ Rada,
Endorse G, unless that leads to voting for VJ Rada
I award myself a Platinum Ribbon - cuz I think I'm the speaker. BOOM.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 16:17 Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Woo!
>
> I award myself a Platinum Ribbon.
>
> Speaker in Agora and Emperor at Blognomic at the same time, hurrah!
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:58
I'm sorry I didn't properly restrict my agency up front. I apologize for
expecting my fellow agorans to only exploit me a little bit. I apologize
for stopping VJ Rada's obvious greed when it came to exploiting me in a
non-consentual way. I do NOT apologize for taking control of my own body,
my
I wouldn't make it a shall, but simply allow for deputisation? I don't want
the Arbitor to get dinged - and this shall adds another burden for an
already heavy office.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:48 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I submit the following Proposal, Arbitor's
I am not sorry, and I wish I hadn't had to make VJ Rada banned from my odd
little agency. I am not sorry, and I wish I hadn't had to make VJ Rada
banned from my odd little agency. I am not sorry, and I wish I hadn't had
to make VJ Rada banned from my odd little agency. I am not sorry, and I
-excluded'
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:59 AM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I retract the quoted pledge.
>
>
> I intend with 24 hours notice, to change the agents and powers of the QAZ
> agency to be as follows:
>
> Agents: If someone is an agent to another Age
I do as the nomics do.
I transfer to Agora the Stamp Value, in shinies, to create a Stamp.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:48 PM Josh T wrote:
> I would like my cheap stamp for September as well for very much the same
> reason.
>
> I transfer to Agora the Stamp Value, in
I change my vote in the Prime Minister election to be Quazie followed by
every other current player alphabetically excluding VJ Rada.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 18:01 VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using QAZ, I cause Quazie to vote for me for Prime Minister.
>
> --
> From V.J Rada
>
I retract the quoted pledge.
I intend with 24 hours notice, to change the agents and powers of the QAZ
agency to be as follows:
Agents: If someone is an agent to another Agency that Quazie is the head
of, then they are an Agent of this Agency as well, except for VJ Rada - e
is a jerk
ey doesn't actually allow for
special deputization.
I judge this CFJ False - Cuddlebeam hasn't earned a Platinum Ribbon.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:36 PM Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 20:49 +, Quazie wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 27, 201
olve the Silver Quill 2016 Agoran Decision.
>
> Votes: 0 valid
> Results: FAILED QUORUM
>
> [Quazie submitted a vote that was beyond a reasonable effort to determine].
>
> CAMPAIGN SPEECH:
>
> While the current Officeholder has done an admirable job attempted to fill
> many
I rescind the quoted intent.
I retract the quoted intent.
I would prefer if uses of my being weren't that controlling.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 20:54 V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As Quazie using QAZ, I give my 24 hours notice to edit the QAZ agency
> to have t
I bid 12 shinies.
The Cagliostro what a place - a lovely little shithole passed from scammer
to slum lord, and it has finally ehard up here: agoran public housing.
It's not much, but there's a roof, and it mostly doesn't leak, it's got
walls, and they mostly don't have mice living in them - it's
4 - Prime Minister should have the option to submit one Official Proposal a
month
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1 - How does Random work here? I'd like an example somewhere in the
> ruleset of what Random means and how to random.
>
1 - How does Random work here? I'd like an example somewhere in the
ruleset of what Random means and how to random.
2 - Why no 2 and just a jump to 3?
3 - I'd love a report that just listed the Fearmonger's attempts at repeal
and re-enactment, at the same monthly cadence - I imagine an OFF post
.
Also - Cuddlebeam should've gone this route vs using QAZ as it's less
likely that e didn't win (Though I still don't know if e won) - and it
creates well ordered chaos vs batch acting (For each of A do B) which often
fails in Agora.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.
If cuddle beam didn't successfully use QAZ to appoint emself speaker, I do
the following:
{
If I have won the game recently due to a ratification by V.J. Rada
{
I resign as Prime Minister
I deputize for Prime Minister as they are late to appoint a Speaker,
and appoint myself as
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:57 AM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend, with 24 hours notice, to establish the following agency:
> Name: Quazie's Autonomous Zeal
> Head: Quazie
> Agents: If someone is an agent to another Agency that Quazie is the head
> of, t
I intend, with 24 hours notice, to establish the following agency:
Name: Quazie's Autonomous Zeal
Head: Quazie
Agents: If someone is an agent to another Agency that Quazie is the head
of, then they are an Agent of this Agency as well.
Powers: Perform any action on Quazie's behalf, but this power
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:15 PM Nic Evans wrote:
> On 07/22/2017 02:41 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> > pool. For this decision, the vote
I pay nichdel a nickel's worth of shinies for taking over as Assessor.
I resign from the office of Assessor.
I intend to deregister myself without 2 objections - not one of these scams
has even come close to working, and I'm finding it unfun.
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 17:53 CuddleBeam wrote:
> Via "An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. payed, given) by its
> owner to
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 09:40 omd wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Alex Smith
> wrote:
> >> > 1. Pledge and promise are synonyms in ordinary meaning.
> >> > Does that mean a promise counts as per the rules?
>
> Previously, Rule 2450
I endorse ais523
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 13:04 Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 17:57 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I initiate the Agoran Decision to determine public confidence in the
> > judgement of CFJ 3534.
>
> I vote REMAND. It's clear at this point that
I object to all attempts to award patent titles indicated by the quoted
message - I don't think this is interesting to codify, and it will rarely
get updated
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:28 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I hereby intend with 2
1 - you can't assign pink slips - only the Referee can
2 - I disagree with your conjecture - those CFJ assignments were reasonable
and made the game flow better
3 - I object to your moot intent
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 08:58 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
Happy birthday agora!
Also - how does the definition of Day in R1023 interact with the day in the
birthday rule?
I award myself a Magenta Ribbon cuz it's Agora's Birthday and I wished it
Happy times.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 08:09 Alex Smith wrote:
> Happy birthday,
Welcome back G. Also - check your dates I think you're off by one?
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 07:11 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > The word in question is a real Arabic word, translating to "I invite" /
> > "I call" / "I appeal". If we
I CFJ on the following statement: "In the below quoted message, a CFJ was
initiated on the phrase 'أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن البيان التالي'"
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:16 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I call for judgement on the following statement : أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن
I CFJ on the following statement: "In the below quoted message, a CFJ was
initiated on the phrase 'I call for judgement on the following statement'"
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 16:16 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I call for judgement on the following statement : أدعو إلى إصدار
I object to anything in the below message I can.
As this might be a report I issue a COE on it, specially that the report
isn't clear.
I also vote for myself in any agoran decision initiated by the below
message.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:50 Josh T wrote:
> There
Different name please - will be easy to confuse with trust tokens
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 08:46 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I think this is an interesting idea, but I would love to hear what other’s
> have to say.
>
> Draft regulation:
>
>
t;
> Mon, 15 May 2017 09:27:29 Gaelan paid 1 Shinies (Quazie)
> Mon, 15 May 2017 16:28:54 Agora paid 10 Shinies (ais523)
> Thu, 18 May 2017 21:27:54 grok paid 1 Shinies (Aris)
> Sat, 20 May 2017 19:59:03 Agora paid 4 Shinies (Quazie)
> Sun, 21 May 2017 02:03:05 Agora paid 3 Shinie
eady numbered it, this is CFJ 3513 and I assign
> > it to nichdel.
>
> I remove nichdel as judge of this case, and reassign it to Quazie.
>
> > > I Bar Publius Scribonius Scholasticus. [this is the only difference]
> > >
> > >
> > > Caller's Arguments:
>
58* Aris, [1] 3.0 Assets v7 Aris 6
>
FOR
> 7859* Quazie, grok 1.7 Gentle Judicial UpdatesQuazie 6
>
FOR
> 7860* Quazie 1.7 Cards are power 1.7Quazie 6
>
FOR
> 7861* Quazie, [2] 3.0 Trivia(l) Quazie 6
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:06 AM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Office M[1] Report
I vote as follows:
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:05 AM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I initiate an election for Secretary, as there has been no election since
> the
> last win. I initiate the Agoran decision to determine the new Secretary.
> For
> this decisio
What follows is the initiation of the Secretary, Superintendent, and Tailor
elections
as per the discussion from the Super Election Season thread.
Note for new players: Elections are Instant Runoff, meaning you can cast
votes
as a list. Any portion of your vote, or the entire thing, can be a
I resolve the Agoran Decisions of electing ADoP as electing Quazie.
I resolve the Agoran Decisions of electing Registrar as electing Publius
Scribonius Scholasticus.
I resolve the Agoran Decisions of electing Referee as electing o.
Below are the full results for each election
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:08 Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 09:01 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
> > I award myself a White Ribbon. (According to the latest Tailor's
> > report, I haven't had one since Rule 2438 was adopted.)
>
> I'm not convinced this works.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the
I submit the following 5 proposals:
Proposal: "Gentle Judicial Updates" AI=1.7, co-author='grok'
{{{
Create a new rule entitled 'Recusal' Power = 1 with the following text
{{{
A judge may recuse emself from a CFJ they are assigned to.
When a judge recuses emself from a CFJ the
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:19 PM Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 16:14 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
> > CFJ: "The Registrar must track any switches defined in Agencies or
> > Organizations."
>
>
ROGCBMUV P WKAT
> Alexis RO CBMUV P WKA
> aranea ROGCBM V PLW A
> BedeM W
> G. ROGCBM PLW A
> GaelanC M A
> grokO B
> MurphyC A
> nichdel
1.2 Organization Integration and Stamp Collecting
> pp6 Gaelan1.0 Sequential Numbering
> pp7 Gaelan1.5 State of the Union
> pp8 Gaelan, [3] 2.0 Judicial Reform v2
> pp9 Quazie3.0 Throw off Your Chains [4]
>
> Legend: * : Proposal is pending
I mean betterer pledges.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 01:20 Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> COE - I retracted better proposals from the pool.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 01:18 Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Note: there is no pmp any more - is th
I withdraw all proposals i've submitted to the Proposal Competition as the
thing just doesn't work and is currently a useless concept.
I Encourage everyone to ignore the Proposal Competition.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:34 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I retract "Prime
I retract "Prime Minister Says What?" From the pool and the competition.
I submit the following replacement proposal for the Proposal Competition
Trivial Proposal "Prime Minister Says What? (v2)" AI = 2, co-author="Typos,
PSS" mess="Typos"
{{{
In rule 2423 replace:
{{{
The holder of
I, having obtained Agoran Consent, initiate a proposal competition with the
objective of: Treating Agora Right Good Forever by cleaning up the messes
we have collectively created.
I Humbly Request that: Each proposal submitted to the Proposal Competition
be labeled, clearly, in the subject line
Sprocklemsprocklem at gmail.com 19 Oct 13
> 天火狐draconicdarkness at gmail.com 06 Nov 16
> Zachary Watterson [2]tannerswett at gmail.com26 Mar 17
> Quazie quazienomic at gmail.com
I vote for the proposal that changed the most rules.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:42 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I hereby initiate an Agoran Decision for the Silver Quill 2016. The vote
> collector is the Herald and the options are any
Rulekeepor May 18 SLR
> 2
> > ais523 Tailor May 18 Monthly
> 2
> > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus RegistrarMay 18 Weekly
> 2
> > QuazieSuperintendent May 18 W
By the powers vested in me by Deputizing for Prime Minister a little while
ago, and the Speaker is vacant:
I appoint ais523 as Speaker.
Also, anyone have any idea what obligations exist on me if the current set
of laurelled players aren't players (they have since deregistered)?
For reference:
stagnant just as things are starting to get going.
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:45 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend, with 2 to 14 days notice, to deputize for the ADoP to publish
> their weekly report (potentially early, but it doesn't look like the
> deputization rul
I intend, with 2 to 14 days notice, to deputize for the ADoP to publish
their weekly report (potentially early, but it doesn't look like the
deputization rules stop me from doing that).
t; |PSS | F | F| F| F| F|
> |Quazie | F| F| F| F| F|
> |+--+--+--+--+--+
> |F/A | 5/0 | 6/0 | 3/1 | 7/0 | 6/0 |
> |AI | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
> |V | 7| 7| 7| 7| 7|
&
This is purposefully vague, so that we can all work towards cleaning things
up in all the ways we need to clean.
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:49 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby issue intent to initiate a Proposal Competition, with Agoran
> Consent, with t
I hereby issue intent to initiate a Proposal Competition, with Agoran
Consent, with the specified
Objective o
f Treating Agora Right Good Forever by cleaning up the messes we have
collectively created.
I Object - I think a proposal competition around making things less messy
might be more important at the moment vs adding a bunch of new academic
stuff (I like the general idea, but it might not be the perfect time)
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:19 AM CuddleBeam
wrote:
>
I object to anything in this message that can be objected to.
I wish I was the speaker so I could just kill it outright - nichdel, would
you mind objecting?
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 17:38 CuddleBeam wrote:
> Again, no flipping idea if it will work but its free! So
I initiate the Agoran decision to
> determine the new Associate Director of Personnel. For this decision, the
> vote collector is the ADoP and the valid options are the players
> (PRESENT is also a valid vote).
>
> I vote as follows:
[Quazie] followed by a list that is equi
2|2 ais523 2017-05-15 2017-05-26
> Assessor 2|2 nichdel 2016-07-19 2017-05-26
> ADoP[3]2|2 nichdel 2017-05-18 2016-10-23 Y
> Herald 2|2 PSS[4] 2017-05-20 2015-07-02 Y
> Prime Minister 2|2 Quazie 2016-10-24 2016-10-22
Js.
> "Open" refers to if it has a judgement, not if it has a judge.
>
> On 05/26/2017 12:40 PM, Quazie wrote:
> > I CFJ on the following statement "It is possible to assign judgments
> > to CFJs"
> >
> > Evidence:
> > {{{
> > Rule 591/42 (
I CFJ on the following statement "It is possible to assign judgments to
CFJs"
Evidence:
{{{
Rule 591/42 (Power=1.7)
Delivering Judgements
When a CFJ is open and assigned to a judge, that judge CAN
assign a valid judgement to it by announcement, and SHALL do so
in a
Well bad judgments can be overturned - so the cookie recepies likely
wouldn't stand
Unless:
I CFJ on the following statement:
'The judge assigned to this CFJ will be kind enough to include eir favorite
cookie recipe in eir judgment.'
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:54 CuddleBeam
If there actually is a victory election being held, and if giving Gaelan a
shiny will cause Gaelan's vote to include 'Quazie' in eir instant run off
list, then I pay Gaelan 1 Shiny.
I believe the 2nd clause is true, but i'm uncertain of the first clause - I
think there is a victory election
How do we go about rewarding G. for caring enough about us to maintain
clerking for the court, even after e deregistered, even after this influx
of CFJS.
I can't seem to see an arbitrary way to award patent titles - though ais523
might have that via Junta?
If there is a way I'd like to award G.
;
> > In the last seven days, I conditionally paid Publius Scribonius
> > Scholasticus 20 shinies on three separate occasions.
>
> This is CFJ 3510. I assign it to Quazie.
>
> > Caller’s evidence quoted below.
> >
> > Exhibit A:
> >
> > > On
In the victory election I vote [Quazie, G., Peter Super, My Girlfriend
Emily, my cat named Sergeant Bartholomew snugglepants, an apricot, root]
Obviously an apricot isn't a valid vote, does that invalidate my entire
runoff?
Is there even a victory election? I thought there was some doubt.
If I
> If the barring attempt was sufficiently unreasonable ("I bar whoever
> walked the most steps on the day this CFJ is assigned a judge") then I
> would also state it couldn't be a proper barring attempt, but CuddleBeams
> barring seems reasonable enough to me.
>
> On S
Correction:
I pay myself 1 Shiny.
I identify myself as the last person to pay me a Shiny.
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 20:17 Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I pay myself 1 Shinely.
>
> I identify myself as the last person to pay me a shiny.
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at
I pay myself 1 Shinely.
I identify myself as the last person to pay me a shiny.
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 20:00 Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I pledge to pay 2 shinies to the first person who can clearly and
> correctly identify the last person to pay Quazie a shiny, as long
there)
Evidence:
QPS's Supposed Text:
{{{
Quazie will Pay the Shinies (QPS)
Head: Quazie
Agents: All Players
Powers:
If Quazie makes a pledge in which e pledges 1 Shiny in return for an
action or statement, the first player to fulfil the action/statement
in the pledge can transfer
I issue the Cabinet Order of Dive:
{{{
I award myself a Green Card for attempting a known IMPOSSIBLE action
(This very attempt at issuing the Cabinet Order: Dive).
}}}
The above action is impossible, as issuing cards is secured at Power 1.7,
and Executive orders is a Power 1 rule.
I'm
Sorry to not get on this until now. I'd be down with a rule that defined a
word "Assets" perhaps, and note that Shinies and Estates are both
considered Assets. Then the amendments would be easier to make in the
future, we would just have to edit the concept of 'Assets' and the two
rules would
Note: Thanks for helping me test my script for unicode compliance -
delighted that no changes were necessary to handle your unicode.
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:10 PM Josh T wrote:
> I resolve my quoted intention and establish the agency therein.
>
> 天火狐
>
> On 22 May
> 7853* ais5233.0 Close Ancient Loopholesais523 N/A [1]
>
FOR
> 7854* ais5233.0 Close Recent Loopholes v2 ais523 N/A [1]
FOR
> 7855* Quazie1.0 Limited Agencies ais523 N/A [1]
>
FOR
> 7856* Quazie2.0 Shiny Relev
I consent. Consent has nothing to do with voting strength, yeah?
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:33 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I hereby announce intent to award the degree Associate of Nomic to G. with
> 2 Agoran Consent.
>
>
> Publius
it consent.
}}}
}}}
I retract the proposal quoted below:
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:38 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: "Betterer Pledges, but because of reasons we can't define a
> pledge without doing a lot of extra work
I submit the following proposal:
Proposal: "Betterer Pledges, but because of reasons we can't define a
pledge without doing a lot of extra work, so we won't" AI=1.7 Coauthor='G.,
Gaelan, Aris'
{{{
Replace the text of Rule 2450 with the following:
{{{
Breaking a publicly-made pledge is a
As 24 hours have past, I Establish WTQ
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 2:17 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend, with 24 hours notice, the establish the following agency:
>
> Title: Who Trusts Quazie (WTQ)
> Agents: All Players
> Powers: If a player issues Quaz
Judge of the Call for Judgement
> > submitted by this message.
>
> This is CFJ 3505. I assign it to Quazie. (My own current understanding
> is that the attempt to bar the judge fails because it's a conditional
> action based on information that will only be available in the future;
> p
I make myself ineligible to judge CFJs by CuddleBeam until further notice,
if possible.
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 7:49 AM Nic Evans wrote:
> Language, as used by humans, is descriptive not prescriptive. You can't
> force any meanings or content to exist without consensus among
So this is an agency that allows you to refer to this agency?
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:33 Josh T wrote:
> I intend to establish the following Agency after 24 hours:
>
> Name: ⌑≌⋻ შეესაბამება एजेन्सी (⌑შए)
> Agents: All persons
> Powers: Any person may refer to this
Not a public forum - Please resend G.
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:40 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 22 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > People can stop objecting because it is already dead.
>
> People can remove objections, so it's prudent not to
To the proper forum this time.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:22 AM
Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning
To: <agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org>
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:10 PM Publiu
I submit the following proposal: "Issuing Cards is secured with power
threshold 1.7." AI=1.7
{{{
Change the power of rule (Bankruptcy) to 1.7
Change the power of rule 2451 (Executive Orders) to 1.7
}}}
---
As I've stated in discussion, these rules can't actually issue cards
without this
Given what G. Has stated below:
I file a motion to reconsider CFJ 3482 with two support.
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 23:46 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 22 May 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > No rule defines an “Instrument.”
> R1688 defines "Instrument" explicitly: "An
e was DISMISSED:
> > > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3478
> > >
> > > while noting there was no way to join the organization, so maybe you
> > > didn't actually join? Dunno if it's relevant to the current text of
> > > the
1 - 100 of 423 matches
Mail list logo