On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 9:43 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> I initiate a Call for Judgment on the following statement: "The
> investigator of the Finger-pointing done in this message CAN impose a
> fine on Jason Cobb for the Crime of Oathbreaking."
I favor this case.
AAAH formatting (thanks Thunderbird).
[This is the same CFJ, just with some added newlines.]
I withdraw my most recently submitted CFJ.
I initiate a Call for Judgment on the following statement: "The
investigator of the Finger-pointing done in this message CAN impose a
fine on Jason Cobb for
Well, the new judgment for CFJ 3736 [0] renders this trivially FALSE. I
withdraw this CFJ.
[0]: Excerpt from Judgment in CFJ 3736 by omd
Levying a fine is certainly a regulated action, and Rule 2125 takes
precedence over all of the Cold Hand of Justice-related rules due to
higher power, so
On Sun, 2019-06-16 at 01:25 -0400, Jason Cobb wrote:
> I initiate a Call for Judgment on the following statement: "The
> investigator of the Finger-pointing done in this message CAN impose a
> fine on Jason Cobb for the Crime of Oathbreaking."
Gratuitous arguments: the rule in question says "CAN
Oooh look, I broke my Oath. How unexpected!
I point my finger at Jason Cobb for the Class 0 Crime of Oathbreaking.
I fully admit that I am guilty of the above accusation.
[Also, sorry for all of the CFJ's I have created lately. I really don't
mean to overload the people who have to deal with
