On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 19:26, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
wrote:
>
> Jason wrote:
> > Sorry, do people have other support/objections for these? I would prefer
> > not to just let them die.
>
> I object to the capitalisation one for the same reason as Alexis.
>
> I object to the lists one
I support each and every one.
-Aris
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:43 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I've finally gotten around to drafting these, so I intend, with Agoran
> consent, to enact the following Editorial Guidelines:
>
> [Informal title: "Capitalization"]
>
> {
>
>
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 19:05, Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> They're separate attempts, so you could object to only the
> capitalization one.
"I intend, with Agoran consent, to enact the following Editorial Guidelines:"
does not seem like multiple separate intents.
Jason wrote:
> Sorry, do people have other support/objections for these? I would prefer
> not to just let them die.
I object to the capitalisation one for the same reason as Alexis.
I object to the lists one because the example given is very confusing.
It's not an inline list because it's
On 2/6/20 6:58 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> After reading through them again, I object. I have no issues with the
> latter two, but I am personally opposed to the idea that terms of art
> should not be capitalized; it can enhance clarity to do so.
>
> -Alexis
They're separate
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 18:43, Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
>
> I've finally gotten around to drafting these, so I intend, with Agoran
> consent, to enact the following Editorial Guidelines:
After reading through them again, I object. I have no issues with the
latter two, but I am
On 1/27/20 6:43 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I've finally gotten around to drafting these, so I intend, with Agoran
> consent, to enact the following Editorial Guidelines:
Sorry, do people have other support/objections for these? I would prefer
not to just let them die.
--
Jason
On 1/28/20 6:41 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> It is interesting to consider changing our use of pronouns, but if
> we're not changing anything, is there any reason to cover pronouns in
> the editorial guidelines at all? I don't see any confusion or
> inconsistency related to them,
I've finally gotten around to drafting these, so I intend, with Agoran
consent, to enact the following Editorial Guidelines:
[Informal title: "Capitalization"]
{
Capitalization of terms of art should follow, as closely as possible,
existing usages of the term. In the event of inconsistent
