I also support.
I would argue that it does satisfy the SHOULD, as by having that office,
e has the trust of Agora to publish a report when e is required to, and
by not publishing for so long, e has lost that trust (at least for now).
On 6/3/2018 6:49 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
I support.
Probably
I support.
Probably doesn't satisfy the SHOULD but it's a SHOULD.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:38 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I announce intent to impeach Kenyon as Rulekeepor, with 2 Agoran Consent.
> (removing em from office is nicer than continual blottings).
>
> First time this has been used,
I announce intent to impeach Kenyon as Rulekeepor, with 2 Agoran Consent.
(removing em from office is nicer than continual blottings).
First time this has been used, so here's the Proposal that created the
impeachment rule for referemce in case there's some bug in it
(proposal 8036 took
