Re: OFF: Re: Assignment of CFJ 4069 to 4st [Re: BUS: Overly Effective Identity Theft Protection, Or, Is There A Rule 105]

2024-03-25 Thread nix via agora-business
On 3/25/24 10:37, nix via agora-official wrote: > On 3/11/24 17:52, nix via agora-business wrote: >> On 3/11/24 17:41, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote: >>> CFJ: There exists a rule 105. >> I number this CFJ 4069. I assign CFJ 4069 to 4st. >> > This has since been recused. I assign CFJ 4069

Assignment of CFJ 4069 to 4st [Re: BUS: Overly Effective Identity Theft Protection, Or, Is There A Rule 105]

2024-03-11 Thread nix via agora-business
On 3/11/24 17:41, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote: > CFJ: There exists a rule 105. I number this CFJ 4069. I assign CFJ 4069 to 4st. -- nix

BUS: Overly Effective Identity Theft Protection, Or, Is There A Rule 105

2024-03-11 Thread Gaelan Steele via agora-business
CFJ: There exists a rule 105. The remainder of this message forms arguments, except for the word “Gaelan” at the end, which is my signature. In 2007, Proposal 4894 “Red Tape Scam” was adopted. It reads: { Create a rule titled "Fantasy Rule Changes" with this text: A proposal generally