There doesn't seem to be a cost to giving people more options like this, so
I'll just give this a shot too:
I create and submit the following Proposal:
Title: Unradiance v2
AI: 1.0
Author: Yachay
Co-Authors: None
{
>From rule 2657, remove "* Being the author of a proposal that takes
effect, at
Third time's the charm? I withdraw my proposal Populist Priming. I
submit the following proposal:
--
Title: A Populist PM
AI: 2
Author: G.
Coauthor: Janet
Amend Rule 2451 (Executive Orders) by appending the following list item:
- Proxy
[Since we're going through an extra-pedantic period on R105...]
I withdraw my proposal Populist Priming and submit the following proposal:
--
Title: Populist Priming
AI: 2
Author: G.
Amend Rule 2451 (Executive Orders) by appending the following list
> On Jul 1, 2022, at 8:12 PM, secretsnail9 wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {
> Title: Stacking Stones
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: secretsnail
> Co-authors:
>
> Enact a new rule with title "Balancing Act" and the following text:
> {
>
> "Stone Above" is a stone switch
On 9/17/2021 12:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I may close this offer early by announcement
> (to meet the 4-day publication minimum for rule changes, if
> there are any in the clauses).
hm, slight modification: I can't guarantee that I will post the final
clause document in time to meet the
On 6/6/21 15:27, Jason Cobb wrote:
> I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal (stolen from Trigon
> with permission):
>
> Title: The Name of the Win Cards
>
> Adoption index: 3
>
> Author: Jason
>
> Coauthors: Trigon
>
> {
>
> In ascending numerical order, amend each enacted rule by
>
Actually, acting too quickly, apologies to H. Promotor Aspen. Thought
there was a text issue, but not really.
I hereby submit a proposal with the same specifications as the proposal I
created below.
On 9/4/2021 1:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I withdraw this proposal. -G.
>
>
> On
I withdraw this proposal. -G.
On 9/4/2021 1:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> [I'll pay to pend this one after any comments come in].
>
>
> I submit the following proposal, "another device defect", AI-1:
>
> ---
> Amend Rule 2655 by replacing:
> responsible for building
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 3:46 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal. IIRC all the changes I've made since
> the last draft were stylistic.
>
> -Aris
> --
> Title: The Great Rollback
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-author(s): G.
I pay a pendant to pend this proposal.
I vote FOR Proposal 8493.
On 2020-09-04 18:17, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>
> I demonstrate the following rulebending form:
> -
>
> Every valid ballot on the referendum to adopt Proposal 8493 [quoted below]
> that
I demonstrate the following rulebending form:
-
Every valid ballot on the referendum to adopt Proposal 8493 [quoted below]
that has a vote of AGAINST or that evaluates to AGAINST is hereby withdrawn.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:20 AM nix via agora-business
wrote:
>
> On 8/28/20 1:09 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> > On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> >> I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
> >>
I vote FOR
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:02 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/28/2020 12:28 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:10 AM nix via agora-business <
> > agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
On 8/28/2020 12:28 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:10 AM nix via agora-business <
> agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>> I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
>>>
I wrote:
nix wrote:
On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
---
Increase the power of Rule 2633 (Rulebending) to 3.
On 8/30/20 1:39 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> nix wrote:
>
>> On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>> I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Increase the power
nix wrote:
On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
---
Increase the power of Rule 2633 (Rulebending) to 3.
I vote AGAINST
On 8/28/20 12:28 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:10 AM nix via agora-business <
> agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>> I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments",
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:31 AM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 28, 2020, at 5:17 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
> > ---
On 8/28/2020 3:28 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:10 AM nix via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
On 8/28/2020 12:28 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:10 AM nix via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
On 8/28/20 2:20 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> On 8/28/20 1:09 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
>> On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>> I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
>>> ---
> On Aug 28, 2020, at 7:20 PM, nix via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> On 8/28/20 1:09 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
>> On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>> I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
>>>
On 8/28/20 1:09 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
>> ---
>>
>> Increase the power of Rule 2633 (Rulebending) to 3.
On 8/28/20 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
> ---
>
> Increase the power of Rule 2633 (Rulebending) to 3.
>
>
TTttPF
> On Aug 28, 2020, at 6:30 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal, "nope", AI-1: {
> Repeal rule 2633.
> }
>
> I submit the following proposal, "nopenopenope", AI-3: {
> Repeal rule 2633.
> }
>
> I'll pend these unless there's a consensus this is bad
I submit the following proposal, "Minor Adjustments", AI-3:
---
Increase the power of Rule 2633 (Rulebending) to 3.
---
I pay a pendant to pend the below proposal ("Please
at 4:32 PM, omd wrote:
Proposal: Upvotes (AI=1)
I retract this proposal, since it seems like G.’s proposal (or something
along its lines) has wider support.
I pay a pendant to make the below proposal pending. -G.
On 7/5/2020 3:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I submit the following Proposal, "Agora the karma bank",
> AI-1, coauthor omd:
>
>
>
> [First, a partial reset.
On 6/9/2020 9:05 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
Forgot the initialization. I withdraw the above proposal.
I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling B", AI-1:
I retract this proposal, by the way
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:56 PM Rebecca wrote:
> Fair warning, I'm probably going to spam the forums with proposals this
> week as it will become extremely difficult to create proposals in a short
> period of time.
>
> I create this proposal (the rationale for
[Grammar fix]
I withdraw "zombie auction fix" from the Proposal Pool.
I submit the following Proposal, "zombie auction fix 1.1", AI-2:
Amend Rule 1885 (Zombie Auctions) by replacing:
I withdraw the below proposal - I'll wait and see if raising the max
on its own is accepted, before re-proposing.
On 1/12/2020 8:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal, "of what use honor", AI=2:
>
>
I withdraw the below proposal (will work on suggested edits).
On 1/12/2020 7:40 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I submit the following Proposal, AI=3, "no fake CFJs needed":
>
>
> Amend Rule 2201 (Self-Ratification) by
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, October 20, 2019 8:35 PM, Nch wrote:
> Since we're spitballing ideas anyway right now...
>
> I intend to, after some time for review, submit the following proposal,
> "Roulette Gaming", with AI=1:
>
> Enact a power-0.6 rule titled "Roulette Gaming"
Oh phoo, I forgot to specify power=3 for the High Zombie.
I retract my proposal The High Zombie.
I submit the following proposal, The High Zombie, AI-3:
Create a Power=3 Rule titled "Boo!!" with the following text:
Ugh that should say "withdraw" not "with draw".
If I have not done so already, I withdraw the proposal that I submitted
that has the title "Regulated actions reform".
Jason Cobb
On 6/22/19 1:13 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I with draw the proposal that I submitted that has the title
"Regulated
I with draw the proposal that I submitted that has the title "Regulated
actions reform".
Jason Cobb
On 6/22/19 12:03 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
Seeing no objections, I submit the following proposal:
Title: Regulated actions reform
Author: Jason Cobb
Adoption Index: 3.1
Coauthors: Aris, G.,
Oh, right, I pend the two proposals that I submitted in the past 5 minutes.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 6:51 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> Title: Attainable Karma
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors:
>
> [We were expecting at least a few players to be in these bands, but
>
I pay Agora 1 sh. apiece to pend the proposals “Restraining Bolt” and “BILLY
MAYS HERE”.
-o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
I pay 10 shinies to pend Granular Paydays (v3).
On 05/03/17 21:11, Nic Evans wrote:
> I withdraw the proposal titled 'Granular Paydays (v2)' I submit the
> following proposal.
>
> Title: Granular Paydays (v3)
> Adoption Index: 1
> Author: nichdel
> Co-author(s): Aris, o, G.
>
> [v3: added the
On Oct 28, 2014, at 4:09 PM, omd wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote:
A rule which purports to allow a person (a special deputy) to
perform an action via special deputisation for an office thereby
allows them to perform the action by
On Oct 26, 2014, at 9:38 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
I submit a proposal with a title of Speedliness and an adoption index of 3:
I withdraw this proposal, and submit the following very similar proposal, also
titled Speedliness and also having an adoption index of 3:
Amend Rule 2160 Deputisation by
I retract the following proposal:
--
Proposal: Scorekeepor Reports (Adoption Index=9.9)
Append the following to Rule 2420 (Score):
The Scorekeeper's weekly report includes a list of the scores of
all of the players.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I submit a proposal, titled Seventy-Three Ninety-Five: In Rule 2367
Messy Statements, replace inaccurate and incorrect with
nonsensical and meaningless.
I withdraw this proposal, and submit an otherwise-identical
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:13 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Let Golems vote (AI=3)
I retract this proposal, I don't like it anymore.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:07 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: I have no idea what I was thinking with the original proposal
Amend Rule 2352 (The Ambassador) by appending:
The Ambassador CAN act on behalf of Agora with Agoran Consent;
such actions SHOULD be consistent
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:36, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
Proposal: War (AI = 2)
Hostility is a switch for subsets of players of size 2 tracked by the
Scorekeepor, with values peace (default) and war. Any player CAN, with
notice, declare war on any other player. Any player
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:56 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I call for judgement on the following statement: The Promotor SHALL a
proposal titled 'People are People' within four days.
I accidentally a verb. I retract that CFJ and CFJ on the following
statement, submitting the same arguments
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Better Degree Awarding (AI = 1, II = 1)
Amend Rule 1367 (Degrees) in the following ways:
Change the text reading:
- Each player's voting limit on the decision is thrice what
their voting
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Restrict Card Destruction Window (AI = 2, II = 1) {
Amend the first paragraph of Rule 2262 from
When a judge judges an interested case within its time limit, e
earns a draw from the Deck of
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 13:31, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the following:
Free Parking
AI: 2
II: 1
I withdraw the proposal Free Parking from the pool. I submit the
following proposal:
Free Parking
AI: 2
II: 1
{
In R2262, add the following to the list of cards in the Deck
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 15:34, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
Audit Cleanup
AI: 2
II: 1
I play Distrib-u-Matic to make this proposal distributable.
BobTHJ
I wrote:
Proposal: Kill it with fire
Terminate the contract known as Points Party at the time this
proposal was submitted.
I play Distrib-u-Matic to make the above proposal distributable.
Well, crap. H. Majority Leader ais523, would you please veto this
when it comes up for vote, so
I withdraw my proposal Hand Limit Remodel from the pool and submit
the following instead. I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable:
Hand Limit Remodel v3
AI: 3
II: 1
{
Append to the numbered list in R1728 (Dependent Actions), bullet item a):
{{
4) With Notice.
}}
and replace:
{{
(if the
I withdraw my proposal Banks from the pool and submit the following
instead, playing Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable:
Banks v2
AI: 2
II: 1
{
Create a new rule titled Banks (Power=2) with the text:
{{
A Bank is a public contract whose purpose includes facilitating a
means of asset
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 13:56, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Office Rewards/Penalties Revision
I retract the above proposal and submit the below proposal instead.
Then I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable:
Office Rewards/Penalties Revision v2
AI: 2
II: 1
{
In R2143 (Official
I withdraw my proposal entitled Reduce Card Complexity v2 and submit
the following instead:
Reduce Card Complexity v3
AI: 2
II: 2
{
[Synopsis: Consolidates the Government, Change, and Justice into one
deck under a new recordkeepor. Reduces the number of cards drawn.
Consolidates card types by
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 00:08, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Flexible Hand Limits
I withdraw this proposal. I submit the following revised proposal:
Flexible Hand Limits
AI: 2
II: 1
{
Replace the text of R2259 (Basic Hand Limits) with:
{{
Each player has a non-negative integer value Hand
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Historically, when Agoran decisions were to be initiated to determine
the holder of the office and there was only one candidate, e would be
installed into office. Recently, when an amendment was passed that
made the
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: No More Distributability (AI = 2, II = 2)
Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) to read:
The Promotor is an office; its holder is responsible for
receiving and distributing proposals.
The
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Proposal: No More Distributability (AI = 2, II = 2)
Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) to read:
The Promotor is an office;
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 23:18, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Yally wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com mailto:aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Eliminate Annoying Judge Requirements (AI = 2, II = 1):
Amend the paragraph
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
Proposal: Eliminate Annoying Judge Requirements (AI = 2, II = 1):
Amend the paragraph of Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) reading:
When a judicial question on culpability is judged after a number
of rests
Yally wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com mailto:aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Eliminate Annoying Judge Requirements (AI = 2, II = 1):
Amend the paragraph of Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) reading:
When a
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
Proposal: Reworking the Anarchist (AI = 1, II = 3)
The Anarchist's proposals are rarely accepted. This proposal proposes two
changes, both of which serve the purpose of having the Anarchist's proposals
actually be
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
Proposal: Reserve Fora (AI = 2)
So that no player sends an announcement in the reserve fora (which many
will likely
not receive because nobody pays attention to the reserve fora) in lieu of
the commonly
used
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:03, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
A public message is a message sent via a public forum, or sent
to a reserve forum if all public fora are not functional, or
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
Proposal: Democracy When Reasonable (AI = 2, II = 0)
{
Change the text of rule 2142, Support Democracy from:
A player CAN, with 2 support, change an ordinary decision to be democratic.
to:
A player CAN, with 2
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
Activate the PRS
AI: 1
II: 1
{
Upon the adoption of this proposal the contract known as the Points
Relay Service becomes a contest with BobTHJ as its contestmaster
}
I withdraw the
On Nov 14, 2007 9:56 AM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I submit the following proposal, titled Contracts are a subset of
agreements (II=0):
I retract Contracts are a subset of agreements, and I submit the
following proposal, also titled Contracts are a subset of agreements
(II=0):
Amend
Not in the discussion forum, you don't.
... I *check* this now. Every time. How did this happen?
Oh, well.
I withdraw my proposal earned citizenship from
the proposal pool. I submit the following proposal, earned
citizenship/1 at AI=2:
{{{
BobTHJ and root are coauthors of this proposal.
I retract my proposal Simplify quorum and submit the following
corrected version.
Proposal: Simplify quorum
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 879 (Quorum) to read:
Quorum for an Agoran decision is 5, unless
a) this is larger than the number of eligible voters with a
73 matches
Mail list logo
