Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 8:12 PM Rebecca via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I intend to destroy the following pledges without objection > Grok's gratuitous (arguments were submitted and he already gave the cash, > also there's no such thing as a shiny) > I object to this

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

I pay 5 coins (my Officer salary) to Falsifian On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 3:01 PM Rebecca wrote: > COE I forgot to include the contract "needlessly abstract exchange". I > also forgot to include G's shinies contract. I accept the CoE and publish > the below report valid as of now. > > I also

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

I intend to destroy the following pledges without objection Grok's gratuitous (arguments were submitted and he already gave the cash, also there's no such thing as a shiny) Rousseau was better (the proposal referred to was withdrawn) Trigon is a show-off (punishment was levied here) On Wed, Jun

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

Coe: the text of Rousseau was better is wrong On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:06 PM Rebecca via agora-official < agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > This is the notary's weekly report (the last one before I lose the > position, sad) > > There are 3 contracts > > ===

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

CoE: Since you sent your DRGN message to a discussion forum and I attempted to pf it, your attempt at joining the contract was ineffective, and your attempt at buying shares may have been effective, depending on whether my pf attempt failed completely or partially. I recommend joining the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly report

Jason wrote: On 2/9/20 1:48 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: If Notary does not have Ministry set, then I set it to {Economy}. I believe you can only do this without objection, per Proposal 8291's rule "ministries". Right you are, expunged that from the database as well. I

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly report

twg wrote: Gaelan wrote: NOTARY'S REPORT OF JANUARY 29 2020 Ooh, just occurred to me you don't have a Ministry set! That probably wants doing. I reckon Economy probably fits best, since the Ministries rule specifically calls out contracts ("private enterprise") as falling under Economy.

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

Gaelan wrote: > PLEDGE > |Jason Promises to Reassess Jason| > |MADE: Jan 30 2020 13:33|WINDOW: 7dy|EXPIRES: Feb 06 2020 13:33|N: 2| >

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

Accepted. The NOTARY expresses frustration that eir text editor blatantly ignored the fact that clearly e had MEANT to save that file, even if e didn’t say so. Gaelan > On Feb 8, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business > wrote: > > On 2/8/20 8:26 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-official

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

On 2/8/20 8:26 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-official wrote: > PLEDGE > |Jason Promises to Reassess Jason| > |MADE: Jan 30 2020 13:33|WINDOW: 7dy|EXPIRES: Feb 06 2020 13:33|N: 2| >

[CFJ] Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly report

I wrote: > Gaelan wrote: > > NOTARY'S REPORT OF JANUARY 29 2020 > > Ooh, just occurred to me you don't have a Ministry set! That probably > wants doing. I reckon Economy probably fits best, since the Ministries > rule specifically calls out contracts ("private enterprise") as falling > under

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly report

Gaelan wrote: > NOTARY'S REPORT OF JANUARY 29 2020 Ooh, just occurred to me you don't have a Ministry set! That probably wants doing. I reckon Economy probably fits best, since the Ministries rule specifically calls out contracts ("private enterprise") as falling under Economy. Only the ADoP can

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

CoE: It looks like you accidentally copied something from another contract onto the bottom of OotOH. On 4/25/2018 7:12 AM, Ned Strange wrote: The following Contracts exist. Each Contract except the first was created since the last report. Many Contracts were also destroyed. --- Order of the

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

I cause the following contracts to transfer 1 sh. apiece to Agora to pay their monthly sustenance: * 狐票店 * MiniNomic * The Agoran Credit Union I intend, with notice, to destroy the following contracts, which were unable to pay their sustenance payments: * No Self-Indulgence * Reporting Agency

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

> On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:29 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > >> On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote: >> >> This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0 >> except the third paragaph, then add the text "this contract has no >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

Ah, nevermind. I doubt it did, but just in case that made the whole message fail, I support. On 11/21/2017 6:02 PM, VJ Rada wrote: Agoran consent, not two support. On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:57 AM, ATMunn wrote: I support and do so. On 11/21/2017 3:11 PM, Corona

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

I support and do so. On 11/21/2017 3:11 PM, Corona wrote: I support On 11/20/17, Aris Merchant wrote: On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:29 PM Owen Jacobson wrote: On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote: This is my

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

I support On 11/20/17, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:29 PM Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> >> > On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote: >> > >> > This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:29 PM Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > > > This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0 > > except the third paragaph, then add the text "this contract has no > >

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

> On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0 > except the third paragaph, then add the text "this contract has no > effect". > > (o, you should destroy isnack2.0. only the notary can do so w/ agoran

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0 except the third paragaph, then add the text "this contract has no effect". (o, you should destroy isnack2.0. only the notary can do so w/ agoran consent i believe, although anyone can w/out objection) On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

" For one week after this contract's inception, players should come up with sequel jokes stupider than the current title. Whoever comes up with the stupidest sequel joke, as judged by V.J. Rada, SHALL be transferred 5 shinies from V.J. Rada. The title of the contract shall be amended

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:05 -0500, comex wrote: RESTS NameRests Notes --- ehird 1 As a fee-based action costing 2 ergs, I revoke a Rest from ehird. -- ais523

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

ais523 wrote: On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:05 -0500, comex wrote: RESTS NameRests Notes --- ehird 1 As a fee-based action costing 2 ergs, I revoke a Rest from ehird. CoE on the Herald's weekly report posted on or about

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly Report

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Ed Murphy wrote: Murphy | 2010-01-31 21:33:55-08 | 1 Oh you've still got one? I expunge this by paying a fee. -G.