On 1/29/23 17:31, nix via agora-business wrote:
>> "TPP"[1] Madrid, G., Aspen
> I intend, without 2 objections, to shred The Plunder Partnership. Based
> on coins, which do not currently exist.
I do shred The Plunder Partnership.
>> "SEAMSTRESS"[3]
On 1/29/23 17:36, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 1/29/23 18:31, nix via agora-business wrote:
>> There are way too many dead contracts right now. It's detrimental to
>> gameplay to have all this clutter that makes it difficult to determine
>> what things are active and useful. Thus
On 1/29/23 18:31, nix via agora-business wrote:
> There are way too many dead contracts right now. It's detrimental to
> gameplay to have all this clutter that makes it difficult to determine
> what things are active and useful. Thus below I intend to shred most
> existing contracts, and give a
There are way too many dead contracts right now. It's detrimental to
gameplay to have all this clutter that makes it difficult to determine
what things are active and useful. Thus below I intend to shred most
existing contracts, and give a reason why. I recommend anyone that
objects also addresses
