I intend to assign both CFJs referenced in this conversation to myself,
without 3 objections.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> I intend to assign both CFJs referenced in conversation to myself,
> without 3 objections.
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at
I intend to assign both CFJs referenced in conversation to myself,
without 3 objections.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> I don't think we want to waive platonism to that degree. However, it
> would seem reasonable for you to issue a
I assign this CFJ to myself, being without objections.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> I think you intended to assign a CFJ to yourself about 8 days ago, G.
> Should probably do so.
>
> I intend to assign this CFJ to myself without 3 objections.
>
I think you intended to assign a CFJ to yourself about 8 days ago, G.
Should probably do so.
I intend to assign this CFJ to myself without 3 objections.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I find Shenanigans. Since the zombie act-on-behalf rule
I find Shenanigans. Since the zombie act-on-behalf rule means
Corona CANNOT cause Quazie to perform illegal actions:
-If the bid was illegal, it failed and no crime was commited;
-If the bid was legal, no crime was committed.
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I point my finger
Gratuitous:
"Allowed to act on behalf" in R2532 is a specific and intentional reference to
"allows [...] to act on behalf" in Rule 2466:
When a rule allows one person (the agent) to act on behalf of
another (the principal) to perform an action, that agent CAN
perform the
I point my finger at Corona for violations of Rule 2532, "Zombies",
and/or Rule 2466, "Acting on Behalf", committed by causing Quazie to
violate Rule 2550, "Bidding". I CFJ, barring G., on the statement
'Rule 2532, "Zombies", enables zombie owners to act on behalf of their
zombies.' I CFJ,