I create the following contract called 'Relevance Forcer':
"Madrid CAN transfer 1 coin to this contract by announcement.
If proposal 305 has an AI, Madrid CAN transfer 1 coin from this contract to
themselves by announcement."
I then transfer 1 coin to Relevance Forcer, twice. I then transfer 1
I've been wondering about this for a while and I figure it would make an
interesting, hopefully non-DISMISS CfJ.
I'm very convinced that nomic is entirely a perspectivist, subjective
game, but let's see how that holds up to Judgement.
I submit the following CfJ: "Facts (for example, 2 + 2 = 4),
Generally, I think we’d expect you to present evidence that you were right.
Also, welcome back CuddleBeam.
H. Herald, we don’t appear to have ever made CuddleBeam a scampster. This
is a grave oversight. I (informally, but I’ll make it formal after Patent
Petitions have passed if I have to)
I’m curious about how CfJs and the gamestate would work with secret
gamestate info like this.
I become part of that contract.
By virtue of that contract, I act on behalf of G. and D Margaux to transfer
all of their assets to myself.
By virtue of that contract, I destroy that contract.
Now, of
