Re: BUS: Finger Pointing

This is a 200 word apology for purposes of expunging that blot. I still have more other blots which it is too late for me to expunge. RIP. Agoran Sillyness is a heavy responsibility. I took that responsibility onto myself when I decided to become the Silly Person. However, I clearly had no leg to

BUS: I think this is fixed now

I declare myself eligible for a Medal of Honour.

BUS: from each, to each

In honor of May 1, the zombie collective shares its wealth... On behalf of o, I transfer all of o's liquid assets from o to myself. On behalf of omd, on behalf of pokes, I transfer all of pokes' liquid assets from pokes to omd. I plan (though don't pledge) to manage omd's assets separately

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ re "pay"

Well, that's interesting. You're ineligible, but I that isn't a requirement for using certiorari. The ruling isn't unreasonable, and comports with the interest of the game. Intend, with both 2 support and Agoran consent, to enter this judgement into moot. I object to my own intent. -Aris On Mon,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ re "pay"

Oh heck, if there's a time for a political power play in pursuit of the greater good, it's now. I issue a Cabinet Order of Certiorari (Arbitor) to assign the below case to myself. I deliver the following judgement: FALSE, based on the Caller's Arguments for FALSE. On Mon, 30 Apr 2018,

Re: BUS: Setting up money-printing machine

I transfer all asssets from the orchard at (2,1) to myself. I give consent to Quazie to transfer assets from any of my facilities to emself until the end of this month. I act on behalf of Quazie to transfer all assets from the refinery at (1,-2) to emself, and then transfer these assets to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ re "pay"

I retract my CFJ On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:15 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I CFJ on: If the Rules say you CAN do something by paying assets, without > specifying a destination for the payment, you CAN do it by transferring > those assets to anyone. > > Arguments: > >

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Proto: Nerf Zombies

Which provision most bothers you? I might be willing to drop the one zombie limit if it strikes you as reasonable, it's probably unneeded with the dependent actions change. I'd even consider extending the expiration to 90 days, although having one just seems like common sense to me. Those are as

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ re "pay"

I CFJ on: If the Rules say you CAN do something by paying assets, without specifying a destination for the payment, you CAN do it by transferring those assets to anyone. Arguments: Straightforward argument for TRUE: R2166 overrides common definitions by making "pay" a synonym for transfer: >

BUS: Re: DIS: Proto: Nerf Zombies

On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > This is an attempt at a significant reduction in zombie power (so we > don't need to repeal such a fun mechanic). I have attempted to keep > them usable while at the same time not making them overpowered. This > also creates a standard notion of which

BUS: CFJ re "pay"

I call a CFJ with the statement "To "pay" assets is to transfer them to anyone" many arguments in the recent Setting up money-printing machine discussion thread. -- >From V.J. Rada

Re: BUS: Judgement in Two Linked CFJs.

I deliver this judgement. This is for CFJs 3634 and 3635 On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Ned Strange wrote: > I am called to judge the following CFJs, presenting two questions of > statutory interpretation. The first CFJ has the statement " 'Rule > 2532, "Zombies",

Re: BUS: Paying upkeep (also looting)

Since it is now a new week, I can loot again. I move to (0, +1) and then to (-1, +1) using corn, and transfer the assets belonging to the orchard there to me. On 04/29/2018 04:52 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: I take all the assets from where I'm standing. I spend a corn to travel from to (0, -1),