Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Blackjack, anyone?

2020-01-26 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
Warrigal wrote: > I intended to realize the infinite shoe I object, just in case. -twg

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Blackjack, anyone?

2020-01-26 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-business
On 1/26/20 3:50 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote: > I know next to nothing about blackjack, but that sounds like it might be > difficult if the "shoe" is "infinite" as Warrigal says in eir pledge. > And anyway, it's only two coins and promises to be, if not amusing, at > least mildly

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3793 judged FALSE (zombies work but not for Gaelan)

2020-01-26 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
Alexis wrote: > I think this needs to be addressed properly in the judgment. I intend, with > 2 support, to group-file a motion to reconsider CFJ 3793. > > I will likely have more argument on this but not at the moment, figure I > should get the intent going though. Aris wrote: > I support. I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Blackjack, anyone?

2020-01-26 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
Matthew Berlin wrote: > If you publish a hash of the shoe beforehand, and the entire shoe > afterwards for verification of the hash, you might get more takers, I know next to nothing about blackjack, but that sounds like it might be difficult if the "shoe" is "infinite" as Warrigal says in eir

Re: BUS: Blackjack, anyone?

2020-01-26 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-business
Oh and sure let's not neglect to have fun. Pursuant to the below pledge, I ante up. On 1/26/2020 10:37 AM, Tanner Swett via agora-business wrote: > I pledge, with N = 5, that for each player who gives me 2 coins as a > bet within the next 3 days, I will deal that player a blackjack hand > and

Re: BUS: Blackjack, anyone?

2020-01-26 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-business
CFJ: If a player other than Tanner Swett gives Tanner Swett 2 coins in reference to the quoted pledge, it creates a contract between Tanner Swett and that player. Arguments: I think this meets the standards of agreement set out for making contracts (even, as per precedent, when the word

BUS: Blackjack, anyone?

2020-01-26 Thread Tanner Swett via agora-business
I pledge, with N = 5, that for each player who gives me 2 coins as a bet within the next 3 days, I will deal that player a blackjack hand and resolve the bet according to the rules of blackjack. I will deal myself (as the dealer) only one hand, rather than one hand per player. If I ask you for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3793 judged FALSE (zombies work but not for Gaelan)

2020-01-26 Thread Aris Merchant via agora-business
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 8:59 AM Alexis Hunt via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 11:40, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < > agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > On 1/26/2020 7:38 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote: > > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3793 judged FALSE (zombies work but not for Gaelan)

2020-01-26 Thread Alexis Hunt via agora-business
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 11:40, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 1/26/2020 7:38 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote: > > Alexis wrote: > >> I'm not sold on this, or on the precedent. > >> > >> R2125 is clear that actions can only be

Re: BUS: CFJ 3793 judged FALSE (zombies work but not for Gaelan)

2020-01-26 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
I wrote: > === CFJ 3793 === > > Rance’s master switch is set to Gaelan. > > == > > Caller:Gaelan > > Judge: twg >

BUS: CFJ 3793 judged FALSE (zombies work but not for Gaelan)

2020-01-26 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
=== CFJ 3793 === Rance’s master switch is set to Gaelan. == Caller:Gaelan Judge: twg Judgement: