I object.
the current report, it has already been pointed out to be in error.
Also, this doesn't distinguish Weekly vs Monthly report.
I also object, in the STRONGEST possible way (e.g. I'd resign Herald),
to making Patent Titles self-ratifying. This is a permanent, slow-moving,
historical
I object to this intent as well.
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> I object to the quoted intent, as the Herald's most recent report is a Weekly
> Report and therefore this intention fails to operate as intended.
>
> Without objection, I intend to ratify the Herald's most recent
I object to the quoted intent, as the Herald's most recent report is a
Weekly Report and therefore this intention fails to operate as intended.
Without objection, I intend to ratify the Herald's most recent monthly
report.
On 10/12/2018 04:17 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
That's rather silly.
That's rather silly.
Without objection, I intend to ratify the Herald's most recent report.
I submit and pend the following proposal:
title: Heraldic uncertainty
author: Trigon
ai: 1.5
Amend rule 649 by appending the following sentence to the first paragraph:
The Herald's monthly
I self-move to reconsider in light of the below mentioned changes in the
underlying Rules, which might or might not by implication preclude wins by
proposal.
I would very much appreciate any evidence and arguments that anyone has on
that topic, especially since I wasn't around for that Rule
CFJ judged TRUE: “At least one person won the game as a result proposal 8097
taking effect.”
Judge's Arguments:
The text of Proposal 8097 (reproduced in full in the Evidence section) is split
into two sections by a horizontal line of double pipe marks (||). The left
side
of the proposal
