I intend, without objection, to amend Rule 693 (Agoran Decisions) by
replacing "When the rules calls for" with "When the rules call for".
On 4/19/20 6:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to replace "statue" with "statute" in the
> first paragraph of rule 105.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I object. The issue was a result of proposal misapplication and has now
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 9:21 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for catching that. I intend, without objection, to replace "an
> statue" with "a statute" in the first paragraph of rule 105.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 8:54 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-business wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to replace "statue" with "statute" in the
> first paragraph of rule 105.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
It also says "an statue" rather than "a statute". I
I intend, without objection, to replace "statue" with "statute" in the
first paragraph of rule 105.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I withdraw my objection (quoted below).
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 23:12, James Cook wrote:
> I object to the below-quoted intention.
>
> (Based on some brief research, both spellings are common. For example,
> I think Judgment is as common as Judgement, or nearly so, in both
> American and British
I object to the below-quoted intention.
(Based on some brief research, both spellings are common. For example,
I think Judgment is as common as Judgement, or nearly so, in both
American and British English, and historically Judgment was more
common. Was there another reason to make the change?)
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 2479, "Official Justice", by
replacing "Summary Judgment" with "Summary Judgement".
(Yes I know intents are broken, but if the fix is retroactive then it's not a
problem)
-twg
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:47 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 1586 by replacing entity
with entity's name at the end of the paragraph:
{
If multiple rules or contracts (hereafter documents) attempt to
define an entity with the same name,
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 1586 by replacing entity
with entity's name at the end of the paragraph:
{
If multiple rules or contracts (hereafter documents) attempt to
define an entity with the same name, then they refer to the same
entity. A document-defined
10 matches
Mail list logo
