Quazie said this: "e sent the message to the wrong place twice". However, the original CFJ message appears on the business archives. It also appears on my outbox sent to agora-business@agoranomic.org, not the discussion page. I believe the original CFJ did count and thus the resolver of this CFJ must decide whether a player must bar someone in the same post as their full CFJ.
I would argue that TRUE is the case as common sense etc would make it easier on players who accidentally forget something, and there is a perfectly sensible textual reading that allows it being sent in a seperate message (that is that barring is seperate). I am also curious as to whether my CFJ will have to be relitigated if Murphy's CFJ were to be judged false? I don't think that would be the case but just asking.
