On 1/25/2020 7:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3799.  I assign it to G.
> 
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3799
> 
> ===============================  CFJ 3799  ===============================
> 
>       If the report referenced by my previous CFJ were to ratify, its
>       'specified time' for the purposes of Rule 1551 would be 00:00 UTC
>       on 2020-01-20.
> 
> ==========================================================================

Judgement in CFJ 3799:

The report in question had the following time information:
> This report:
>   Published:      2020-01-24
>   Accurate as of: 2020-01-20 00:00

This is sufficiently clear that the "time of report" was 2020-01-20 00:00.

R1551 reads in part:
>                                             the gamestate is modified
>      to what it would be if, at the time the ratified document was
>      published, the gamestate had been minimally modified to make the
>      ratified document as true and accurate as possible; however, if the
>      document explicitly specifies a different past time as being the
>      time the document was true, the specified time is used to determine
>      the minimal modifications.

The "2020-01-20 00:00" timestamp was sufficient at "explicitly specifying" a
different past time, so this is the date for ratification purposes.  TRUE.

Reply via email to