Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3924 Assigned to Cuddlebeam [@Cuddlebeam]

2021-08-15 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-business
Cuddlebeam wrote: I also claim Blue Glitter. I award 7 boatloads of coins (154 coins) to Cuddlebeam.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3924 Assigned to Cuddlebeam [@Cuddlebeam]

2021-08-15 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-business
Cuddlebeam wrote: I claim a Blue Ribbon by the way. I also claim Blue Glitter. Ribbon for the first judgment and Glitter for the second, I assume? I submit the following proposals and pay one (1) pendant to pend it. Proposal: Reasons for Ribbons (AI = 3) Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3924 Assigned to Cuddlebeam [@Cuddlebeam]

2021-08-09 Thread Cuddle Beam via agora-business
I claim a Blue Ribbon by the way. I also claim Blue Glitter. On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 4:44 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 8/9/2021 7:36 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > > On 8/9/21 9:17 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: >

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3924 Assigned to Cuddlebeam [@Cuddlebeam]

2021-08-09 Thread Cuddle Beam via agora-business
Alright, re-Judging: I Judge FALSE. Backed by the arguments provided, I have become convinced that it is possible to try to simultaneously flip a Switch. However, doing so would attempt to make it an indeterminate value, and by R2126, such attempts would instead cause the switch to take on its

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3924 Assigned to Cuddlebeam [@Cuddlebeam]

2021-08-09 Thread ais523 via agora-business
On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 22:48 +1000, Ned Strange via agora-business wrote: > I too support With support from R. Lee and G. (and unofficially cuddlybanana), I group-file a Motion to Reconsider CFJ 3924. -- ais523

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3924 Assigned to Cuddlebeam [@Cuddlebeam]

2021-08-09 Thread ais523 via agora-business
On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 12:45 +0100, ais523 via agora-business wrote: > On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 13:31 +0200, Cuddle Beam via agora-business > wrote: > > I Judge FALSE. > > I intend, with 2 support, to group-file a Motion to Reconsider this; > the statements that this makes about the judgement of CFJ